[TBP]

They choose their “truth” over facts.

[rx]

Despite what Sullivan may have said, CJ Roberts said it can't be because Sullivan is a biased judge.

The CJ shot back to Trump's earlier complaint about biased judges in the 9th Circuit in partisan debate fashion, declaring, "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.”

Both the CJ's and Sullivan's actions have proved the CJ was clearly in error.

[kiryandil]

Dirty Emmet Sullivan is a corrupt POS.

He interfered in a US Senate election to sway the makeup of the United States Senate [Ted Stevens].

[ClearCase_guy]

We need to revive the concept of jury nullification. Jurors don’t have to be unbiased. If I’m on a jury and the defendant is accused of shooting a pedophile — the guy’s innocent. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

[lurk]

Imagine a Yankee-BoSox weekend series where the umpire crew has decided every call and pitch will go against the Sox.

[blackdog]

Are we to assume that the media establishment has figured out that when the judge hijacks the prosecution and represents himself as the prosecution, that a fair and impartial justice system is in peril?

How did that happen?

[blackdog]

The hundreds of billions Obama loaded onto cargo planes and flew to Tehran, sure paid some hefty commissions to some mighty high level politicians. Flynn was against that act of treasonous bull$hittery. Obama bypassed Congress (who's job it is to appropriate spending) and the whole Beltway became quiet about it.

Flynn has been tasked with keeping that subject quiet. Get Flynn!

[blackdog]

Sullivan is tasked to keep Flynn quiet. My bad.

[scrabblehack]

So is the case now Sullivan v. Flynn (rather than U.S. vs. Flynn?)

[Gnome1949]

If federal judges are no longer neutral, the United States is defacto dissolved. There is no longer any need to respect the law because U.S. law now will depend on specific people placed in charge telling us what the law is. We put OUR people in charge to get one version of law. We then FORCE OUR law on the enemy. The enemy puts his people in charge to FORCE his version of law upon us.

This is GOVERNMENT OF MEN, not government of laws.

This is a recipe for bloodshed and revolution.

[Dogbert41]

What's the difference?

[I am Richard Brandon]

We need the boot from Monty Python to descend from the sky and squash him like a bug.

[joma89]

Yet another example of how government becomes the enemy of “certain” people and the batterng ram for others.

JoMa

[nathanbedford]

It would, if left unchecked, destroy the neutrality of the federal courts. If that were to go, the judiciary’s legitimacy and public respect for its dictates would be destroyed.

That train left the station long before Judge Bork was borked.

[Robert357]

Federal judges can be impeached. Sullivan sounds like a man who should be given a choice, resign or be impeached.