[DoodleDawg]

Your decision not to carefully read Johnson v Thompkins resulted in your being sat down sternly.

Your failure to answer the question is duly noted. But not surprising.

You should take care so that it does not become necessary again.

Go for it.

[jeffersondem]

“Your failure to answer the question is duly noted.”

Have you duly noted that you failed to answer the question asked of you in post 430?

Post 430 came just before your post 431 - in which you were forced to asked a diversionary question.

If you want to refute Johnson v Thompkins and the federal court system, refute it.

Go for it.