Have you duly noted that you failed to answer the question asked of you in post 430?
Post 430 came just before your post 431 - in which you were forced to asked a diversionary question.
If you want to refute Johnson v Thompkins and the federal court system, refute it.
Go for it.
But after reply 429 where I first questioned your bizarre claim.
If you want to refute Johnson v Thompkins and the federal court system, refute it.
Refute what? That Baldwin said in dicta that property in slaves was the foundation of the Constitution? Hard to refute that; it's part of the record. You asked if I knew whether the decision was overturned by the Supreme Court. I've found no evidence that it was but so what? What I was questioning was your idiotic statement you don’t think anyone denies that the corner stone of the United States Constitution was slavery. On the contrary, other than you and Justice Baldwin I don't know anyone who does think that. I certainly don't believe it, which alters your claim right there, and I was hoping you would explain just who this "everyone" is that you are referring to?