Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

“I disagree. After the election, Trump would have no remaining reason to restrain his response. Plus it would serve no purpose.”

~~~

That depends on the make up of the Senate.

Also, I actually can see the opposite sort of thing from Trump after the need for re-election is off the table and he is free’d up a bit on policy. I could see him backing off from pressuring these whack-job run liberal cities and let them continue to shoot themselves (and unfortunately their citizens) in the foot, and focus on ‘law and order’ where the people and their leaders actually want it.


78 posted on 07/21/2020 7:26:24 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: z3n

Also, I actually can see the opposite sort of thing from Trump after the need for re-election is off the table and he is free’d up a bit on policy. I could see him backing off from pressuring these whack-job run liberal cities and let them continue to shoot themselves (and unfortunately their citizens) in the foot, and focus on ‘law and order’ where the people and their leaders actually want it.
___________________________________________________________
I think these cities need to be cut away from their respective states, it would do those states a world of good and isolate the infection to the Lib progressive cities. Treat them like commonwealths with no power in congress and maybe no input in the elections and certainly no power in the states.


119 posted on 07/21/2020 8:25:39 AM PDT by joegoeny ("Nuts!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson