Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teaching Robin DiAngelo’s ‘White Fragility’ Will Get You Sued
The Federalist ^ | July 20, 2020 | Adam Mill

Posted on 07/20/2020 7:51:48 AM PDT by Kaslin

Legions of 'trainers' holding up 'White Fragility' are indoctrinating government agencies, corporate workforces, and schools. People subjected to it have good grounds for a lawsuit.


The eyes of the highly paid trainer fix on your reddening face as she holds the book aloft. Then she reads to you from the sacred text of Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility:

While the idea of color blindness may have started out as a well-intentioned strategy for interrupting racism, in practice it has served to deny the reality of racism and thus hold it in place … Racial bias is largely unconscious, and herein lies the deepest challenge-the defensiveness that ensues upon any suggestion of racial bias. This defensiveness is classic white fragility because it protects our racial bias while simultaneously affirming our identities as open-minded … we can’t change what we refuse to see.

How does one respond to this? Using erudite, academic words, a stranger has just accused you of being an “unconscious” racist. Worst of all, if you try to deny it, that’s just “white fragility” that “obstructs” the fight against racism. Denying you’re a racist is proof that you’re a racist.

Across the country, legions of these types of “trainers” are fanning out to indoctrinate in schools, government agencies, and corporate workforces. After a period of instruction, the trainers organize their students into small groups in which only one topic may be addressed: anecdotes of “racist” thoughts and deeds that reinforce the hypothesis. It’s like a giant group trial in which the accused is allowed to apologize but never allowed to defend herself.

Of course, nobody likes to be called a racist, particularly people who strive not to be one. It’s particularly galling to be assigned this malignant opinion by a stranger who knows nothing about the accused except the color of her skin.

Among the “praise” DiAngelo quotes for her monograph of poison is one describing her work as “a great contribution in promoting the necessary policy change and healing this country requires.” Yet in reality, the opposite is true. Indeed, if dwelling on ethnic grievances promoted peace and understanding, then the Middle East would be the most peaceful place on earth.

Should one suffer in silence as strangers affix the label of “racist” to each white forehead regardless of background or experience? Many people try to brandish their intersectionality credentials to escape the label. Were your ancestors among the 360,000 northern troops who sacrificed their lives for the freedom of African-American slaves? Did your white but Jewish ancestors barely escape the Nazis’ effort to “defend” Germany? Are you related to the white Muslim Bosnians slaughtered to address some ancient historical grievance?

Or are you a patriotic American who is committed to the principles of equal justice under the law? You can try your luck in the victim competition in your small group. But good luck with your tales of anti-Irish discrimination in the 1800s. By leveraging your family history, you’re helping to validate the woke dismantling of equality. Don’t play that game.

Or you can object. Truly, you have the right to object. Strangers do not have a right to assume your opinions based upon the circumstances of your birth. No, we don’t all have “unconscious biases” that make up a greater tapestry of “institutional racism.” That’s an unprovable hypothesis based upon a race-based stereotype.

In your workplace environment, it might not be prudent to speak up. It might cost you your job in an unfavorable labor market. But if you do have the courage to speak up, here is something you might say:

I don’t agree that I have an unconscious bias against people who are different from me. You’re telling me what I think and what I believe. If you want to know what I think, you can ask me. If you want to tell me about your own biases and prejudices, I’ll listen.

But it’s not appropriate for me to tell you what you think. It’s not fair to assign me an opinion about other people. You don’t know me. And I won’t agree to you making assumptions about my beliefs.

If the trainer persists, or you are disciplined for resisting this racial stereotype, file a discrimination complaint with Human Resources. It’s not legal to discriminate against any race or skin color—yes, even Caucasians.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission proudly trumpets its courtroom victories fighting discrimination, including when it occurs against Caucasians. In Kilgore v. Trussville Development, the EEOC successfully sued an employer whose manager repeatedly referenced the victim’s race (Caucasian) stating, “you’re the wrong color,” before firing her.

In 2012, Kauai in Hawaii paid $120,000 to settle a federal charge of racial harassment against a Caucasian woman. Her manager continuously made disparaging remarks about Caucasians, told her to assimilate more into local Hawaiian culture, and leave her Caucasian boyfriend for a local boy who was a “person of color.” In 2011, the EEOC successfully sued Dots, a clothing retailer, that denied employment to Caucasian applicants since early 2007.

HR departments should tread very carefully when selecting training in the current environment. If management pushes training that assigns collective guilt to any race, religion, sex, or ethnicity, it may constitute direct evidence of discriminatory intent in a later lawsuit claiming discrimination.

Training based on the book White Fragility, if sponsored by decision-makers as a mandatory expression of corporate culture, will likely be heavily relied upon by future plaintiffs who suspect they were denied promotions, bonuses, and other opportunities due to their skin color.

Every American is entitled to equal treatment regardless of race. That is still the law — at least for the time being. But rights have a way of disappearing if nobody speaks up.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: collectiveguilt; eeoc; identitypolitics; race; racism; racismtraining; robindiangelo; systemracism; unconsciousbias; whitefragility; whiteguilt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: lurk
"People who accuse complete strangers of racism are lazy"... - ..."They are not doing due diligence."

I would think the EEOC is unconstitutional at best...if you are a patriotic American who is committed to the principles of equal justice under the law...the existing EEOC infringes on my rights.

21 posted on 07/20/2020 10:02:12 AM PDT by yoe (Want to HELP the Slave Trade and Drug Cartels in USA? Vote for a democrat........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
Sorry, but the EEOC ignores these complaints.

Personallu sue the company. Then sue the EOCC.

22 posted on 07/20/2020 10:09:50 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

They have zero evidence because unconscious bias theory is unreplicable junk science.

The only way to stop this train is open a can of lawfare on the corporations and academic institutions pushing this garbage.

And that requires big bucks and really smart lawyers dedicated to doing the job. A new legal 501c3 foundation like Pacific Legal Foundation which does property rights litigation, only dedicated to litigating against garbage science.

I am so tired of being told by the wokesters that I have thoughts and feelings I don’t even know I have.

Newsflash for the nimrods. I know all my thoughts and feelings and there are two types. The ones I express out loud and the ones I keep to myself.

I’m not sure I believe there is such a thing as the subconscious or unconscious mind that pop psychology is so fond of prattling on about.


23 posted on 07/20/2020 10:24:01 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

“They are only interested in complaints from “people of color”. (Such a silly expression)”

It grows more and more tiresome and silly. I was born in 1944 in South Carolina where we used to refer to “colored people” to show some respect rather than using other words. Most “colored people” appreciated that at the time but later on they decided that it was disrespectful and they preferred to be called black but then they decided to my amazement that they should not be called black but “African-American” even though the term properly refers to someone who originally lived in Africa but became an American citizen, not someone who is descended from Africans. Now, lo and behold, they are “people of color” I see no difference between colored people and people of color, it is enough to make a sensible person puke. I simply say black people, if they can call me white I can call them black.


24 posted on 07/20/2020 2:01:06 PM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
If you're required to go to one of these events be sure to record the whole thing for yourself and the internet.

Save and copy all handouts and worksheets.

25 posted on 07/20/2020 2:10:50 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just say, “no” to the anti-White racist propaganda. What if a “training” session ended with everyone throwing the book and any outlines in the trash and leaving the room?


26 posted on 07/20/2020 2:18:47 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Rather than cracker, we should demand to be called Saltine Americans. ;-)


27 posted on 07/20/2020 7:31:29 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX ("Pluralism is always a temporary state marking a transition from one orthodoxy to another" Schaefer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

I joined the Navy at seventeen so I would prefer to be called an “Old Salt” but as soon as that is accepted I will decide it is an insult and demand to be called “Whitey”.


28 posted on 07/21/2020 9:25:42 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Ha, ha, good idea.


29 posted on 07/21/2020 4:52:15 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX ("Pluralism is always a temporary state marking a transition from one orthodoxy to another" Schaefer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson