But the biggest difference is that aristocratic blood carried with it responsibilities. They had to live up to a moral code, and had to look out for the interests of their tenants, show a brave face against adversity, be chivalrous, not impregnate their tenants’ daughters, and if they did take at least assume financial responsibilities for the child and see to his future. The Nazis believed that being “Aryan” gave them both a license and a duty to obliterate the “inferior races,” who were conspiring against them anyway, and take their lands and property for the benefit of the “master race”. It was the idea of superiority without any filial attachment whatever.
Nazi and radical Muslim philosophy seem pretty similar. If you aren’t Aryan or Muslim, you should be dead according to their philosophy.
During the Blitz, when Buckingham Palace took some damage The Queen Mother said, “I'm glad it happened. Now I can look the Eastenders in the face’’. So I'm guessing the Old Girl had some guilt. Or conscience.
The Nazis on the other hand believed in a ‘’Volksgemeinschaft’’ or a ‘’peoples state’’ where there were no class distinctions and everyone was the same. A theory they pretty much lived up to. Just if you weren't German, well, too bad for you.
The “Royalist” are still trying to come up with a way to inhale without getting air previously used by commoners