Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NEMDF
on the assumption that there are more positives out there, just not enough testing to find them all.

I just read today--in the story about Florida's "94 percent infection rate" that turned out to be 6 percent--that there indeed have been strange methods of enumeration going on in the offices of our Health Lords:

In Florida, they'd been counting every contact made by someone who tested positive as a "Corona case." No kidding. Whether or not the contact ever got sick. And their definition of testing positive for WuFlu was the presence of antibodies against it. Which most people in the country probably now have from random contacts of their own--which is a good thing.

And . . . they'd been testing many of the same people multiple times. If someone tested positive for the antibodies--which doesn't mean he's sick, or that he can infect anyone else--he was counted as a "new case" each time he was tested! That's how you make 5 or 100 cases out of 1, or out of none.

38 posted on 07/14/2020 2:39:21 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: SamuraiScot

And that is how you make 300 votes appear for Hillary vs 6 votes for Trump from 51 actual vote scan ballots as was what had happened in a voting precinct in Detroit...

The Dems really don’t change their methods...do they?


46 posted on 07/14/2020 3:19:41 PM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson