To: spintreebob
200 scientists recommended they do so?
200 is not a lot of scientists considering how many there are in the world.
I bet we could find 200 who disagree.
Probably afraid to speak out against the mob.
2 posted on
07/10/2020 3:08:32 PM PDT by
airborne
(I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey season!)
To: airborne
:: 200 scientists recommended they do so ::
Scientists, eh?
Why not a couple-hundred “health and medical professionals”?
6 posted on
07/10/2020 3:11:21 PM PDT by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(When we look to government to solve our problems, our "rights" become reduced to "privileges".)
To: airborne
200 scientists recommended they do so?
—
One knows one is dealing with marxists when they think the number of scientists is important. Scientific accuracy is not subject to majority rule.
12 posted on
07/10/2020 3:23:44 PM PDT by
Flick Lives
(My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson