[frog in a pot]

From the article:
...the violent crimes and property crimes rioters have been committing in support of BLM’s political objectives the last few weeks, are things the Second Amendment is intended to prevent.

That is is undoubtedly true.

Unfortunately, however, the title, "BLM has no claim to the 2dA" is incorrect; at least until BLM is determined to be a criminal organization. Passive BLM supporters also remain entitled to 2dA protection until determined otherwise as a matter of law.

Meanwhile, frightened major U.S. corporations willingly "pay protection money"

One wonders if those payments will be included as "business expenses".

How ironic.

[Big Red Badger]

Yup