Posted on 06/19/2020 11:33:22 AM PDT by Kaslin
The Chinese Communist Party is punishing India for working with America, and the President should show the nation stands by its friends.
One of the many discussions our country has had over the Trump Presidency is what it means for America to be “great.” For some, it’s a country which answers to no external pressure, and only the will of its citizens. For others, it’s a state deeply involved in international politics, actively working with other nations to deepen cooperation. Both sides, however, should agree with at least one prerequisite for greatness. If America is great, it will not be silent as its democratic allies are harassed and have their land seized by expansionist dictatorships.
Two weeks ago, in northern India, the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) poured over the border at multiple points, occupying miles of disputed mountainous terrain. With thousands of soldiers involved, the Chinese military aims to cut off India’s access to its own air base.
It’s unknown exactly how much land the PLA forces have taken so far. What is known is that thousands more Chinese troops are fortifying their position and building heavy military encampments, including artillery, armored personnel carriers, and excavators. Initial hopes for a peaceful conclusion to the stand-off ended just yesterday morning, as the Indian government reported that at least 20 Indian soldiers were killed in a melee between the two sides near the occupied zone. Beijing has refused to reveal its own casualty count.
Why did China choose now to seize the area? The land in question, the Ladakh region, has been the subject of dispute before. While the region was once Indian territory, much of it was lost to China in a 1962 invasion ordered by Chairman Mao. But since then, while both have scraped over the border before, no one has actually been killed in over 40 years; it’s hardly a high-profile conflict. The road India was building to its base was well within its own territory, and China has built a remarkably similar one on its own side of the division. Clearly, there’s more at play than an 80-year-old frozen border.
The answer is that the aggression has less to do with a frozen border conflict, and more to do with India challenging Chinese dominance. The two have a long history. For decades, both shared a policy of socialist economics and broadly anti-Western politics. This has changed quite suddenly. As India switches to a primarily free enterprise system, it has grown far more powerful, and drawn closer to the United States than ever before.
This has been especially true under the current administration, which has hardly been soft on China. When President Trump visited the country this year, thousands gathered to see him speak, and over 50 million Indians watched as Prime Minister Modi personally laid out the red carpet. Upon Xi Jinping’s visit, the Chairman was met with crowds of Tibetan protesters, another region occupied by the authoritarian government. The rebuke was not forgotten by the dictator.
Combine these slights with an ongoing play for global leadership, and China’s actions start to make a lot of sense. The Chinese government has been courting a wide range of allies with “investments,” who are then willing to tolerate Xi’s increasingly aggressive foreign policy and internal repression. These have included concentration camps in Xinjiang, seizing control of Hong Kong, occupying the South China Sea, and building PLA bases in Africa to say nothing of its new fiery rhetoric. But while others have muted their criticisms, Indian officials have largely called China’s actions out, and have worked on security arrangements alongside Japan, Australia, and the United States to counter Chinese military expansionism.
The CCP’s motive is hardly a mystery. Modi has made clear India is not in China’s sphere of influence, and that he is willing to work with the United States. Xi is eager to punish him with what he likely hopes will be a humiliating loss. The United States should not allow this to go unmentioned.
This does not mean anything like military force should be used; the Indian Armed Forces are perfectly capable of handling the current crisis. And a call for military adventurism is not only unnecessary, it will likely backfire, giving Xi Jinping cover to protect his new gains. The United States is the most powerful country on earth, militarily and economically. A diplomatic and nonmilitary response alone can seriously impact an aggressive state’s strategic thinking. Look to the 2008 Russian invasion of Georgia, where strong condemnations of the attack helped put an end to the immediate attack.
The US should make it clear to the Chinese government that its provocative actions have not gone unnoticed, and do so as soon as possible. Xi Jinping can be punished by developing an even stronger bond with India. This should include condemnations of the incursion, using the moment to restart stalled talks for a US-India trade deal, and begin formalizing security agreements between the two democracies.
The Chinese government’s recent actions, from its takeover of the WHO to its support of authoritarian regimes across the world, should concern everyone. What is happening in India is independently disturbing and fits into a decade-long trend under Xi Jinping’s leadership. It also provides an opportunity to show the world that the United States stands by its allies, condemns expansionist behavior, and is indeed a great nation.
...
I’ll go one better.
Let’s stay out of it. US has enough to deal with here at home. AMERICA FIRST.
Before supporting India with any moves, get some concessions from India regarding buying U.S. goods and easing up on taking jobs from Americans. It’s one thing to support an ally, but only if it is a two-way deal.
We have our OWN Communist Insurgency and aggression right here, internally, to deal with.
Let’s clean house here first, then we can worry about a war between those two.
China intends to have a short bloody war with India. Given its superiority in aircraft, missiles, armaments, and troops it intends to fight India, inflict heavy casualties and humiliate it. The reason is that China fully intends to take control of Taiwan and the consensus among its leadership is that it must be done by force. China knows history. Prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Russia and Japan fought some intense battles in Manchuria. Japan got mauled and the Japanese high command did not want to fight Russia again. When Hitler invaded Russia, the Japanese refused to open a second front against Russia in the Pacific. Eventually Russia was able to send divisions from Siberia which were critical in turning back the Nazi onslaught before Moscow late in 1941.Japan was intimidated and their refusal to attack Russia changed the outcome of the war.
China means to similarly intimidate India. They do not want an attack from India when they invade Taiwan.
No kidding.
Who wrote this? John Bolton?
John Bolton, is that you?
Sorry...typed before reading other commenters, lol.
I say we “make nice” with India but say nothing to China. And I mean NOTHING. Let them stew in their own juices. Jealousy alone will piss them off. Posters who pointed out that we are dealing with our own communists here are correct. Besides, ignoring China is their Achilles heel and they will ponder why we are not paying attention to the grand country of China.
Agreed. We should ONLY support India if it removes the millions of Indian scabs that absolutely ruined the American middle class.
Barring that, let them nuke each other for all as I care. It would solve both their overpopulation problems. It’s not our fight.
They are NOT our ally and we should just let them kill off the respective cesspool countries. Hey, if we are a good ally, let’s send all India s home to defend their country.
I don’t consider India an Ally. I don’t Shop at Convenience Stores either.
India was proud to lead the “non-aligned” countries during the Cold War; let their non-aligned allies help them. We have no obligation to do so.
India sent a medical team to help in the Korean War (when we fought Red China); let’s send them the same (but only if it is a UN effort as Korea was).
They are not an American ally in a legal sense; they are an ally of Bill Gates in a business sense.
Big difference!
[China means to similarly intimidate India. They do not want an attack from India when they invade Taiwan.]
An invasion across 100 miles of open water is a much more risky endeavor than merely crossing a border. An attack on India might be considered a narrowly-focused dress rehearsal designed to determine whether China can even do a land war successfully against a poorly-armed opponent like India. Don’t get me wrong - India has a bunch of flashy Russian weaponry. But the true test of readiness comes down to the unglamorous nitty gritty details, including how much ammo and parts it has in inventory, and whether it can resupply the troops at the front without big gaps in which the enemy can overwhelm them. Before Xi embarks on a far more risky venture against Taiwan that might be opposed by the full might of the American arsenal, he needs to know his military machine can do what he requires of it. That might mean a much bigger advance into India than anybody is expecting.
India has a perceived grievance against China. It feels that China after 1962 wrongly has land that is rightly India. If China were seriously engaged invading Taiwan, India would be sorely tempted to settle some scores. China wants India to know that it would be very unwise to launch any operations against Chinese interests at any time. They want India to realize that a very high price will be paid for any incursion. Its not that India would seek to help Taiwan but it very well would be tempted to take advantage of the situation. No rational government wants to fight a two front war if they can avoid it.
I don’t know if this is perverse on my part, but I wouldn’t mind a naval incident occur between the USA and China. Then we can cut off ALL trade with the ChiComs.
I have the same sentiments but we must get all of the pharmaceutical companies back on American soil. They have us by the short and curlies otherwise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.