Posted on 06/19/2020 6:31:32 AM PDT by karpov
The U.S. made outrage a form of social currency. Now were in the hyperinflationary phase.
Outrage, over racial injustice or anything else, has always constituted a form of political capital. In its best form it would manifest as the bullion of righteous anger demanding and achieving justice. In its worst form, the cynical and adept could leverage copper pennies of indignation into lucrative television contracts, speaking gigs, lobbying empires and the like.
But the advent of new technologies such as Twitter has dramatically increased the supply of a particular sort of paper anger, with no apparent regard for any real-world limit. Technology also has sped up the pace at which outrage spreads through our political ecosystemin monetary terms, the velocity of this new political scrip.
Its no surprise to a monetary economist, then, if each individual bit of outrage becomes devalued in this marketplace. Politicians, tweeters, old-media commentators, social-media influencers and corporate executives all feel compelled to engage in ever more provocative or elaborate displays of anger. At the moment this takes the form of wokeness, which can be understood as a type of performative progressive outrage used to boost ones capital in the political marketplace.
Sometimes the results are ridiculous, as when Democratic leaders in Congress take a knee while wearing Ghanaian textiles for fear that a traditional press conference no longer draws sufficient attention. Sometimes the results are dangerous. See Twitter, any day in the life of.
Elsewhere, wokeness now appears to be a form of intangible compensation in many workplaces. Surveys consistently show that credentialed millennial employees especially place a lot of value on the social purpose of their employment. This isnt entirely novel. The notion that work should be fulfilling rather than just a paycheck has been growing for a couple of generations.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
Political capitol? Pffft! Monetary these days. Is blm a 501c3? Nope. So the funds blm receives from whoever through an intermediary are not accountable to anyone? Nice gig.
Excellent article that explains why there are those who insist on escalating their ‘wokeness’ and why they will never be satisfied.
It actually offends me that the term "progressive" is used to describe people who push moral decay, climate change hoax, and communist economic plans that have failed around the world. I'm 70 and, overall, our progress has been a negative number.
The old term "liberal" doesn't work either because it's been a long time since liberals/progressives have been in favor of liberty.
Changing a term is very hard to do from the bottom. I know, I've been trying to get the term "unborn" changed to "preborn" for 25 years with very, very little success.
But we need a new term. Any suggestions?
Thank You for posting.
Hell yes it is. Another Dem fundraising group.
Look at Gillette their CEO came out said I dont care if we lose some profit the message is more important. That’s when they were doing all those woke commercials with transgender kids shaving with their parents and stuff. Some of these CEO’s are part of the millennial generation who are cultural Marxists, again it’s a cult.
The ultimate ‘fiat currency’, I guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.