On Daca, Obama Can but Trump Can’t. The Supreme Court endorses a double regulatory standard.

Wall Street Journal ^ | June 18, 2020 | WSJ Editorial Board

[unixfox]

Roberts was cowering to the left because he knows if he doesn’t, Antifa will come after his sorry ass.

[Engedi]

Right like I said in another post in this thread. Where is one person on our side willing to expose Roberts? Crickets.

[Lazamataz]

Trump needs to flood zone with “DACA like” Executive Orders restricting immigration on numerous fronts. OVERWHELM the system and shove it up Roberts ass.

This.

This right here.

[Vision]

SCOTUS is a haughty, corrupt disgrace who thinks they're move clever than they are.

[Crazieman]

Trump may be President, but he is not in power.

[Truth29]

It is actually worse than that. He engaged in child trafficing to get his Irish kids via South America and is totally owned by the Left.

[Jim Noble]

Once again - the Left does NOT have a double standard.

If it’s good for the Revolution and bad for America, it’s good.

If it’s good for America and bad for the Revolution, it’s bad.

That’s a single standard, my friends, it never wavers, and they are extremely consistent about it.

[MinuteGal]

Few people know that Justice Roberts had an unprovoked idiopathic brain seizure in 2007 causing him to fall almost ten feet from a building onto a dock in his summer home in Maine.

He had suffered a previous unprovoked seizure in 1993. At this time he temporarily had to give up some activities, such as driving.

At present, the likelihood of him having another seizure is more than 60%.

A prominent neurosurgeon at Washington DC Hospital Center stated that these unprovoked seizures signify epilepsy.

Leni

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks for the Heads Up MinuteGal. I was not aware of
this.

IMO >>> VVV

I do not have a degree in psychology, so I'm just explaining
what my take on this is.

People who suffer trauma can come away from it with
altered views. Some may see life differently, back away
from sticking to the letter of the law, and base their
decisions more on feelings.

Observing what Roberts' opinions have been, this seems a
real possibility to me.

His reasoning is not what it used to be. This isn't
intended to be an insulting thing to say. I just think
it is a real possibility based on what we have observed.

If he can't stick to the letter of the law, he should step
down.

It's his job to stick to the precise letter of the law,
and he clearly can't do that any longer.