Hillary Clinton lost her appeal, order stands to testify on private server and Benghazi emails

american thinker ^ | 6/14/2020 | Veronika Kyrylenko

[bitt]

Amid the chaos and anarchy across blue-city America that exclusively possessed public attention for the last couple of weeks, it was not hard to miss any other bit of news — especially if that news has not appeared or been even briefly mentioned by any major mainstream media outlet. Take for example the news of Hillary Clinton, who lost her appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on June 2, where she tried to avoid testifying under oath about her emails and the Benghazi case.

The hearing in the D.C. Circuit came in the case Judicial Watch v. Clinton, a public records case involving a request for State Department documents and communication about the 2012 terror attack at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya. U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the attack.

The case also involves Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state. Judicial Watch, a conservative activist watchdog group that files Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials, uncovered another 756 pages of emails the FBI was able to retrieve that were part of Hillary Clinton's unsecured server revealing communications between some prominent Washington figures and classified emails sent by former prime minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair. The emails were part of the batch "Clinton tried to delete or destroy," Judicial Watch stated in its press release. It showed that Clinton had asked Blair to continue using her private email after her confirmation and also revealed that Blair was sending classified information on her unsecured server. Clinton had been "extremely careless" in her handling of classified information, as ex–FBI director James Comey carefully and rather mildly concluded in July 2016,

[upchuck]

When is HRC set to give this sworn testimony?

The last paragraph of the article:

And now, despite all the effort to avoid testimony, Madam Secretary will have to answer questions from Judicial Watch, as the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which will now be heard on September 9. Stock up on your popcorn, America.

Hopefully it will be live streamed.

Perhaps by then Mr. Durham will have issued a slew of indictments. Maybe Killary's name will be on one.

[bobby.223]

I’ll bet by now Huma is tired of snackin’ on ‘Beasty’s crusty old smelly thing!

[Bullish]

Never fear, Hillary’s going to have a lot of memory lapses about any and all of it. It works for her every time.

[sgt_lau]

Dear Lord thank you for not letting this vile harpy become President.

[Ann Archy]

I don’t remember.....Not to my recollection.....Sorry, I don;t recall.

[DrDude]

Thank you for your response.. Three months is a long time. I doubt she will ever sit for a Deposition.

[Elsie]

"I can't HANDLE the truth!!"

[Elsie]

I don't want her to say anything!

I DO want evidence presented and explained.

Then let them chips fall where they may.

[AndyJackson]

Well, there is still en banc and then the Supremes, so this is far far from over.