Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsi_junkie

Keep an eye on the % of positives results. That’s a good indicator if an uptick in #s is because of a rise in testing or actual cases.


31 posted on 06/11/2020 8:43:22 AM PDT by Moonlighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Moonlighter
Keep an eye on the % of positives results. That’s a good indicator if an uptick in #s is because of a rise in testing or actual cases.

I don't follow. If you test 10% of a population for a disease where as many as 80% are asymptomatic, you'll get a certain number of cases, some serious and most not. Ifyou test 100% of the population you'll get a much larger number of cases but that doesn't mean that it's more than you'd have if you tested 100% of the population two months ago when it was peaking.

Hospitalizations is a better analog in my view. Those are serious cases which have a test result. Serious cases requiring hospitalization in March or April would have required it in June if this is when they occurred. So seeing how that number rises / falls is a better indicator than raw cases as I see it. Remember, the point of this was to prevent hospitals from getting overloaded. We're way past worrying about that, it wasn't an issue even at the peak. And yet we still have lockdowns.

39 posted on 06/11/2020 10:21:40 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson