Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's about time! Better we have this now than be surprised by the Red Chinese.

The tighter flying, without having to worry about killing the pilot/crew with too many g's, will really expand the ability over drones of manned fliers.

In my opinion, it is inevitable and should be a USA strategic goal now. Sorry to all you hairy-chested, silk scarf-wearing knights of the sky! I'm looking at you, General McPeak and your v-neck t-shirts!

1 posted on 06/05/2020 10:34:07 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Alas Babylon!

DO you want Skynet. Because this is how you get Skynet.

:)


35 posted on 06/05/2020 12:02:08 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

““There is no level four, fully autonomous vehicle out on the roads today,” he said, despite several companies investing billions of dollars in the idea. “On the other hand, that’s a decade worth of experience we should be pulling into the military because they’ve learned so much.””

Cars are not a good example. Flying autonomously is far, far, easier than driving autonomously. Fedex planes fly themselves. They still have pilots in them. But unless the pilot is bored and wants to land it himself, they take off, fly and land autonomously.

If we (or the Chinese) put effort into fighter drones, they will be very, very successful and push manned fighters out of the sky.


36 posted on 06/05/2020 12:02:20 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!
“The [F-35] competitor should be a drone fighter plane that’s remote controlled by a human, but with its maneuvers augmented by autonomy,” Musk tweeted. “The F-35 would have no chance against it.”

Sounds good. Until the radio link is jammed. Or it gets out of range. Remotely controlled high speed maneuvers in real time will need instantaneous comms at all times so SATCOM doesn't sound like an option as a data link.

37 posted on 06/05/2020 12:04:58 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I trust the pilot’s callsign is Starbuck.


38 posted on 06/05/2020 12:05:34 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson