BIG BULLY
Posted on 06/01/2020 6:54:39 PM PDT by RummyChick
A Virginia police chief grew emotional as he recounted rioters torching a home with a child inside, saying that it was “unacceptable.”
Richmond Police Chief Will Smith repeatedly stopped to compose himself as he detailed how protesters blocked the fire department from responding to a multi-family residence that was set ablaze early Sunday during George Floyd demonstrations.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
“unacceptable.”
Late for work, homework not done, burning down a house with a child inside.
All ‘unacceptable’. It’s the fun catch-phrase for everything!
Hearing that word makes me puke.
Can you explain the point of that? Ive seen you post it and am curious whats the significance.
He forgot to add, “and just not nice”.
Glad I didn’t see his face on the news. Would Might have gone Antifa on my TV!
A big push planned for where? NYC or DC?
BIG BULLY
He called them Protestors!Like homosexuality is "gay", abortions are "reproductive health" and "pro-choice" and keeping people separated is "social distancing", calling terrorists "protestors" is another example of the left bastardizing the language.
But torching a home WITHOUT a child inside? Totally cool, especially if it’s whitey’s home.
Oh, so he didn’t “take a knee” like so many other cops did? How admirable. /s
WHY WHY WHY is this still happening with the terrorists??? This is war; they need to be killed. It’s pretty much fish in a barrel and a great opportunity for the good guys.
Yep, you reap what you sow, chief.
Charge them all with attempted murder.
SHUT UP LITTLE BULLY
Unacceptable?
What will he say next —
“stop. make ‘em stop. I implore you ...”
Such disgusting emasculated weakness.
So burning down a house without a child known to be inside would be acceptable. Uh huh.
Solution: $100 a head bounty on dead rioters, looters, and/or arsonists upon presentation of video evidence of them rioting/looting/burning and a matching corpse.
She cares....
How special.
Caring
Hoping
Lollypops and rainbows
Now, that is what Richmond calls a leader.
Alaska law allows the use of deadly force to prevent someone from committing arson on an occupied structure.
Both ATT & Comcast are licensed telecom/ISP providers, and they both have control over a significant portion of the news coverage.
I’d expect ATT subscribers & investors to strongly disapprove of the continual CNN malice that ATT permits. Would CNN survive without ATT & its subscriber base?
As termed by Trump, “Concast” controls all the NBC properties including NBC, MSNBC, CNBC. I’d expect the Comcast/Xfinity subscribers to object to the continual malice emanating from its news properties.
While Disney, NYT, WAPO also piss on POTUS and conservatives, they’re effectively opt-in operations that one can avoid. But that’s not the case when it concerns telecom/ISP providers like ATT & Comcast.
Telecom must not also have control over the news/media. Telecom is literally a utility.
.
All Arsonists should be shot on sight (in the act)
Looters should get the same (particularly the ones smashing windows)
Time to put down the ‘mad dogs’
.
Thanks so much. Had never thought of it that way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.