Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stravinsky

Roberts is such an ass. “
FULL CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE

Medical personnel surround a car that is going through a coronavirus drive-thru test clinic at the San Mateo County Event Center on March 16, 2020 in San Mateo, California. Drive-thru test clinics for COVID-19 are popping up across the country as more tests become available. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
San Mateo releases new order softer than most of Bay Area
Sonoma sheriff says he did not change stance on enforcing order
Newsom defends Calif.’s accelerated reopening
Oakland mayor tested for COVID-19: ‘It really doesn’t hurt’
Every worker has covid at one US farm on eve of harvest
Marauding monkeys make off with coronavirus vials in India

Supreme Court rejects challenge to limits on church services

Mark Sherman, Associated Press Updated 1:27 am PDT, Saturday, May 30, 2020

50

The rising sun shines over the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday morning, May 11, 2020. Photo: Mark Sherman, AP / AP

Photo: Mark Sherman, AP
Image 1 of 3
The rising sun shines over the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday morning, May 11, 2020.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Friday rejected an emergency appeal by a California church that challenged state limits on attendance at worship services that have been imposed to contain the spread of the coronavirus.

Over the dissent of the four more conservative justices, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s four liberals in turning away a request from the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, California, in the San Diego area.

The church argued that limits on how many people can attend their services violate constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and had been seeking an order in time for services on Sunday. The church said it has crowds of 200 to 300 people for its services.

Roberts wrote in brief opinion that the restriction allowing churches to reopen at 25% of their capacity, with no more than 100 worshipers at a time, “appear consistent” with the First Amendment. Roberts said similar or more severe limits apply to concerts, movies and sporting events “where large groups of people gather in close proximity for extended periods of time.”

How is “congress shall make no law” consistent with the First Amendment as it applies to freaking baseball games?


56 posted on 05/30/2020 5:45:26 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Tyrants don't just give you your freedoms back. You have to take them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

It applies to baseball games because it guarantees the right to assemble freely.


85 posted on 05/30/2020 9:12:39 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson