The guy is a board member of the Audubon Society and this is a designated and protected bird watching site. He was actually doing his duty in trying to get her to leash her dog - dogs aren’t supposed to be there even on leash. And no, he was not “stalking white women.” Sheesh, it’s people like you who give FR a bad name.
I don’t think that even the Audubon Society will support what this man has done in this case - videotaping and posting her response to his off-camera threats. Baiting dogs with treats. I doubt he’ll be left an officer.
All of his actions, his having treats with him, his video of her response - careful not to include his own threats; speak to him doing this before. If the victim is any evidence, we know his targets. Young women like this certainly seem more likely to respond to his threats.
I cannot help but notice that this event is also occurring in what is a “rash” of these supposedly incriminating videos. From the Jogger to Mr. Knee, people are being expected to rush to judgement based on a ridiculous one-sided video clip of an event.
I submit that we are being invited to realize that, “The Camera Lies.”
I would rather HEAR both sides of an argument, than SEE only one.
There is evidence of this man’s involvement in this event that you are ignoring. That gives FR a bad name.