[AndyJackson]

It's a huge trap. When you make a claim about your belief that 93 wouldn't do x, you can count on the Deepsters searching hard to find dirt on one of the 93 to force him to state he would.

And no experienced person would make a claim like that unless it were true, or else that the counterclaim would blow up in the counterclaimant's face.

[kabar]

Give it a break. First, Jensen's statement is not going to be in the brief to the court. His opinion or belief is irrelevant. DOJ makes the decision not to prosecute, not the judge or Jensen. The decision has been made.

Did you read the initial 20 page DOJ statement to Sullivan justifying why they will no longer prosecute? Since then, more exculpatory material not given to the defense has come to light. The new DOJ input will cite this new information further strengthening the justification for their decision.

Not really needed because the law requires the judge to dismiss the case. It's over and has been for some time.

[ClearCase_guy]

Does that matter? No one is asking for volunteers. This is up to the AG. It goes forward if HE wants it to go forward. And he doesn’t.

I don’t see anything like a trap.

[The Man]

Seriously, any prosecutor who would NOT file a motion as the Justice Department has just done in the Flynn case is unethical and, in my opinion, should be fired from their position. Any prosecutor who actually did what the Muller team prosecutors did should not only be disbarred, but should go to jail, just like what happened to Mike Nifong, only longer because the conduct was even more egregious.