Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monty22002

“However, you may still be held responsible for information you provide in commentary or through editing. For example, if you edit the statement, “Fred is not a criminal” to remove the word “not,” a court might find that you have sufficiently contributed to the content to take it as your own. Likewise, if you link to an article, but provide a defamatory comment with the link, you may not qualify for the immunity.”

Twitter is dead to rights.

You really shouldn’t be arguing with someone over a topic that you don’t know squat about and are JUST learning about now.


308 posted on 05/27/2020 8:31:16 PM PDT by thoughtomator (here comes the switch to Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: thoughtomator

I would say they did not actually edit his post, just added an addendum. It was stupid, but they could ban or delete his posts totally legally.


310 posted on 05/27/2020 8:35:10 PM PDT by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson