Unlike the Costco “incident” last week, nothing in the article stated that the grocery store required that everyone wear masks.
If the store did, the owner would be exercising their right to do so, and the maskless customer should probably be happy they weren’t physically assaulted.
If the store did, the owner would be exercising their right to do so, and the maskless customer should probably be happy they werent physically assaulted.
The store owner should be thankful the mask less customer was not assaulted. The resulting lawsuit would be devastating