Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teacher, 36, is arrested for 'having sex with 16-year-old foster son', who used to be her student, after...
Daily Mail ^ | May 21, 2020 | Lauren Fruen

Posted on 05/24/2020 7:41:01 AM PDT by L.A.Justice

A Wisconsin teacher is accused of having sex with her 16-year-old foster son after her husband is said to have secretly recorded their alleged trysts.

Stephanie Pudlowski, 38, was arrested on May 15 after police say audio and video taken in the home they shared in Oneida County showed she had a sexual relationship with the boy.

She has since been charged with sexual assault of a child placed in substitute care, sexual intercourse with a child age 16 or older and causing mental harm to a child, NewsWatch12 reports.

Pudlowski is said to have met the boy while teaching at James Williams Middle School. Police say no sexual contact occurred on district property.

But after taking in the teenager last year Pudlowski is said to have admitted having sex with him, according to authorities.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: education; naughtyteacherlist; teacher; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Gay State Conservative
If I had had an opportunity with her at 16 my guess is I would have taken a rain check.I had standards...even at 16!

Give me a break! Even virtuous 16 year olds fantasize about older women giving them some loves. Even if she was fat and had one leg two inches shorter than the other, at 16 you would have gone after her after about a minute of teasing and coaxing. You have forgotten what it is like to be a young man.

21 posted on 05/24/2020 8:18:04 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Nut job so to speak.....congrats to the husband for outing this psycho bitch...husband needs to fix himself and move on...


22 posted on 05/24/2020 8:29:40 AM PDT by TnTnTn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice

I have to wonder at the husband’s vigor and interest.


23 posted on 05/24/2020 8:33:24 AM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

State laws about recording can be tricky. He probably should have consulted a lawyer before placing the camera in a private location.
...............................................
True, which reveals just how intrusive the police state we now live in has become. Is there any thought, word, or deed that still remains OUTSIDE of the realm of American jurisprudence? No? I didn’t think so!


24 posted on 05/24/2020 8:36:17 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (No foreign enemy is more dangerous than the Democrat Party and those who support it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice

Really - the guy put a camera IN HIS OWN HOME... and you wonder if that’s legal?


25 posted on 05/24/2020 8:39:06 AM PDT by GOPJ (Plan for the worst (intentional bio-weapon attack.) Hope for the best (current plan)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

Laz would not hit it. Therefore guilty.


26 posted on 05/24/2020 8:44:17 AM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

You have forgotten what it is like to be a young man.
...............................................
Well I certainly haven’t, and she looks just fine to me, especially when she’s smiling. Besides, there’s always the bag in daytime and the light switch at night! He he!


27 posted on 05/24/2020 8:46:00 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (No foreign enemy is more dangerous than the Democrat Party and those who support it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

DITO


28 posted on 05/24/2020 8:49:58 AM PDT by squirt (POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED, FOR THE SAME REASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice

Surprised some bizaro liberal prosecutor doesn’t spin this case around to instead charge the husband with child poern.


29 posted on 05/24/2020 8:57:28 AM PDT by inchworm (al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: fireman15
My comment was focused on *this particular* woman...having seen her photo. Yes,there were surely 36 year olds who I would have allowed to "entertain" me.Just not *that* one.

Perhaps at 16 I was a bit more selective than you. ;-)

32 posted on 05/24/2020 9:03:17 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Rats Just Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I had no opportunities for that type of encounter when I was 16, but you were definately more selective than I was at that age. I would ha e taken whatever she was offering at that age. ; ?


33 posted on 05/24/2020 9:14:40 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Is that what 36 year old women look like these days? Makes me glad I’m 60.


34 posted on 05/24/2020 9:31:56 AM PDT by Go Gordon (I gave my dog Grady a last name - Trump - because he loves tweets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice

Would you consider yourself unethical for installing nannycams based on your suspicion that your nanny might be abusing your children?

Would it be fair to classify the NEA as the DNC’s official pedophilia wing?


35 posted on 05/24/2020 9:48:54 AM PDT by DPMD (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

Finally,an honest man. At 16,I would hit on girls that would make a freight train take a dirt road but that’s life in a small town.


36 posted on 05/24/2020 9:51:54 AM PDT by SanchoP (The sheeple cower as the HOAX continues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice

I wonder if he’ll get prosecuted for child porn (while she is prosecuted for statutory rape.)


37 posted on 05/24/2020 9:53:46 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortes fortuna juvat
True, which reveals just how intrusive the police state we now live in has become. Is there any thought, word, or deed that still remains OUTSIDE of the realm of American jurisprudence? No? I didn’t think so!

The recording laws are designed to protect privacy rights. Isn't protecting privacy rights one of the few things we conservatives actually want government to do?

38 posted on 05/24/2020 10:10:37 AM PDT by KevinB ("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice

Well there is a difference between legal, illegal and admissible. I am sure there are many loopholes with respect to expectation of privacy; i.e. bathroom and bedroom vs putting a camera in your OWN family room. Then you have to consider things like nanny-cams when it comes to protection of children. Then you start talking about recording adults and considering what the state says the age of consent is. It all gets kinda murky. If it had been my house: Camera in the bedroom to confirm my suspicions. Once confirmed, destroy that (or save it for a private divorce settlement later). Then install hidden camera in a community-use parts of the house..i.e. kitchen, den, TV room. Patiently wait and capture a series of still pics, no audio and provide those to the police....but that’s just me.


39 posted on 05/24/2020 11:04:08 AM PDT by LibertyF0RAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

The recording laws are designed to protect privacy rights. Isn’t protecting privacy rights one of the few things we conservatives actually want government to do?
........................................................
Of course, but on the other hand just how intrusive regarding our privacy rights do we want the government itself to be? If you look at how legislatures at every level of government operate, enactment of new laws is the never-ending process of rendering virtually EVERYTHING litigable! Call me paranoid, but I can’t escape the feeling that, in the words of a once popular song, “every breath you take, every move you make, I’ll be watching you”!


40 posted on 05/24/2020 11:50:15 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (No foreign enemy is as dangerous as the Democrat Party and its supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson