From now on 302s used in a court should all be challenged as unreliable documents. Site this case in support.
All of them in any and all cases.
I agree The FBI should be made to act like every other law enforcement agency in the US and record their interviews.
According to articles I've read Pientka was supposed to submit the completed 302 within 5 days. It wasn't submitted until 3 weeks later. And then it was rewritten by Strzok and Page, which is totally against policy. The only one who should have made any changes on the form was the original agent who wrote it, and signed it. It's an illegally altered document, and never should have been used in the case. Page wasn't even at the interview, yet she made changes to it.
When I worked in New York State's prison system, any document you had to write, especially if it involved a disciplinary report, or a report on an incident, use of force, etc., it had to be completed and submitted before you went home for the day. There were no excuses. There were strict timelines, especially if a serious incident that resulted in an inmate or officer injury, you had to have the preliminary information presented to the Watch Commander within minutes, because he/she in turn, had to report the incident to Albany as soon as possible. I worked 3-11 p.m., and if something went down in the half-hour before I went home, I had to stay as long as was needed to get inmates/staff to the infimary, have photographs taken, interview the inmates and officer's involved unless they were sent to the outside hospital, have the officers write their report of the event, and the role they played, etc., and have everything completed and written up as soon as possible. And if something needed to be rewritten, the only person who was allowed to do that was the person who originally wrote and signed the initial report, and that was because at any time, those documents could end up in a court of law.
Federal courts should refuse to hear any case brought before them with FBI evidence, testimony, or supporting documents. They have no interest in justice. They found political masters to serve with zeal. Let them be the pariah they are.
TAPE RECORDINGS....NOT someone writing down notes about how it went down.
No 302 should be admissible unless the entirety of the interview process was video recorded (with the subject having the right to make his own recording, and also being given a digitally-signed copy of the FBI recording). The 302 should be just a summary of the recording, with the FBI agents being liable for perjury.