Thanks for posting. Matt Kittle (MD Kittle) is an excellent writer and a great fill-in radio host for our local Conservatives.
And, yes. ALL of us are piling on Judge Hagedorn this week!
“Such claims should be raised by those injured by the enforcement action, not by the branch of government who drafted the laws on which the executive branch purports to rely.”
Looks like Hagedorn is a can’t-see-the-forest-for-the-trees kind of guy. The executive can’t make up laws on her own, even if she pretends the legislature gave her permission.
So a lawmaker who creates and writes a law has no standing to ensure the law is followed as it was intended?
Its great here in Wisconsin. Half the town is open. The other half is bankrupt and will never open. But we can go out. There are bars and restaurants open. And we can go to parks and the beach. People who want to stay in are staying in. Those who are done with the lock down are out. There is a collective sigh. If you work for a government body you are fine. If you work anywhere else you are wondering where you are going to get money.
More good news!
heres the real idiocy as well:
because she didn’t follow the law there can be no criminal penalites.
WHEN YOU DON’T FOLLOW THE LAW IS WHEN GOVERNMENT CHARGES YOU WITH A CRIME.
Ruh Ro.... Looks like the Chicken Freeper contingent are going to face their worst fears, people free to make their own decisions.
All you WI Fearpers, what will you do now that WI is free?
Tie those states in knots, stoke the constitutionalists, and create a freedom Narrative working against Gov. Squidward and Gov. Pitscher.
So we all need to do what we can to see that The Heartland Institute's case is fast-tracked in WI, because clearly they mean to preserve Constitutional issues that would arise to Certiorari. We get Cert on a case like this, we can put this whole nightmare behind us.
"Fabick and Chapman are challenging the order on its merits, arguing that key sections are blatantly unconstitutional.Chapman alleges that language limiting religious gatherings to nine or fewer people violates his right to freedom of religion. The limit has prevented Lakewood from holding in-person Sunday services and distributing communion, he says. Virtual services don’t fulfill the Bible’s call for in-person worship and many elderly members can’t use such services, he adds. [ Ed. note : This exact theory was successful in re-opening churches in Kentucky, but as it was successful, obviously the issue was not preserved for Cert. ]
Fabick, meanwhile, alleges that the order limits his free speech and travel rights. According to the lawsuit, he wants to engage in protests against the order but the travel ban prevented him from joining one in Madison on April 24.
“Even a public health crisis does not give the State executive authorities license to impose measures that are arbitrary and irrational, or that patently violate our most sacred constitutional rights,” the lawsuit said.
Bump.