Sue your government. THEY shut you down and denied you access to the market.
Some other businesses were not shut down.
If those suits are valid, then they’re all going to get very little money because the inurers will go belly-up.
>>Many businesses, including Beast, had “business interruption” coverage through their insurance policies. But insurers across the nation have told policyholders that pandemic-related losses aren’t covered.
In March SXSW said that while they have insurance it doesn’t cover outbreak of disease. And they were making the decision to hold customers’ money for a year telling them that they can have the same passes for next year’s (2021) event.
A policy for disease was available they just said that they didn’t buy it.
This part of the policy would appear to support the insurance company.
Of course the suit is going to allege they had coverage and are were improperly denied. Wouldn’t have a suit otherwise. But almost all business interruption policies have a specific exclusion for pandemics, or something that would include a pandemic. It’s possible this restaurant’s policy is different, but if so it would be in a very small minority.
It seems like a minor thing, but if the insurance industry decided, either in whole or in parts, that they would cover businesses who operated outside of draconian edicts of questionable legality so long as they were still working under other rules consistent with their business insurance. Liability right now is a huge reason more places aren’t opening up.
The virus didn’t close down your business. The state did.
What a pig!
However, she is cute!
-——The ‘suspension’ must be caused by direct physical loss of or damage to property at [the insured] premises.”-——
She and all the others will not collect because the pandemic did not damage any thing resulting in a loss of business.
Legal Seafood is in the same boat after having two claims denied per Fox Business
That’s not going anywhere
She wants a judge to write a Post Facto type of contract spelling out coverage?