Posted on 05/13/2020 8:20:38 AM PDT by jazusamo
Its a sure sign of desperation whenever lawyers try to raise President Richard Milhous Nixon from the dead.
And so it is that a group of former Watergate special prosecutors this week resurrected the Ghost of Watergate Past in a last-ditch effort to keep alive the federal court case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
The gang, adopting the sobriquet Watergate Prosecutors, asked permission from U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan to allow them to intervene in the Flynn case so they can to put it bluntly tell his honor how to think and what to do.
The judge issued an order Tuesday indicating he will soon accept amicus curiae (friend of the court) submissions in the case.
But in trial court proceedings involving crimes, only prosecutors and defense attorneys are permitted to be heard. Judges are supposed to render decisions based on evidence and arguments presented by the parties involved, not outside interests.
The prosecution of Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general, has been on life-support since the Justice Department belatedly moved last week to dismiss charges against him. He was accused of making false statements to the FBI during an interview that was nothing more than a devious perjury trap designed to get Flynn to lie. The FBI was creating a crime, not investigating one.
A review ordered by Attorney General William Barr discovered that former FBI Director James Comeys agents and Robert Muellers special counsel hit squad concealed vital exculpatory evidence from Flynn and his attorneys. The hidden documents showed that the retired lieutenant general did not lie to FBI agents, despite his coerced guilty plea under threat.
The former Watergate prosecutors now want to meddle in the Flynn proceedings like uninvited house guests...
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Being Nifonged will now be replaced with being Sullivaned.
Well then the judge will have to find someone to prosecute the case since the Dept. Of Justice said they are dropping the case because there is no evidence to prosecute him and there never was a Criminal case against Flynn so he couldn’t have lied to the FBI.
WTF is this? Since when do judges decide who gets prosecuted?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.