“(A)nyone brandishing them in such a way as to intimidate or threaten anyone else should be properly handcuffed, properly taken in and fingerprinted.” …Shirkey’s language is not very clear. It seems to leave things open to subjective interpretation by saying “in such a way as to intimidate”, stepping outside what the legal meaning would stipulate for the word “brandish”.
anyone can claim intimidation just seeing something even though its legal to display or be seen with said something
if a person is wearing a maga hat they are intimidating.../s
The Supreme Court has ruled multiple times that vague language on a law renders it unenforceable.