[BenLurkin]

In the months prior to February 23, a motion-activated camera had captured videos of someone inside the house (which was and remains a construction site) at night...After the first time that video captured someone in the house, Mr. English contacted local law enforcement on a non-emergency number and made them aware of the unauthorized entry onto his property.... Nothing was ever stolen from the house...

Are we to believe that this guy set up a camera in a house under construction, saw that the house was being invaded at night repeatedly, and all he did was make one phone call to the police?

He didn't put up fencing?

Why bother putting in a security camera in the first place?

It just doesn't make sense.

[spacejunkie2001]

this guy’s attorney, who wrote this crap, sure is an apologist for bad behavior. Really wants to be the prosecutor too, it seems.

[DesertRhino]

“He didn’t put up fencing?”

They cost lots of money, and temp fences are very easy to climb or pass through. All they really keep out is vehicles.

[libertylover]

Maybe his camera never recorded anyone stealing anything. I’ve gone into numerous houses under construction just to look at the layout.

As far as the video of Arbery entering the house, I don’t see anything there. Perhaps that’s technically trespassing, I don’t know.

The most important thing on the videos is when Arbery charged at the guy with the shotgun.

[trebb]

If the camera sends data to "the cloud", it makes sense to have it w/o the additional expense of a fence---how many new home constructions have you seen with fences around them?

It almost sounds like you're blaming the guy having the home built for what others might do.

[Hot Tabasco]

He didn't put up fencing?

I've never seem fencing put up around any new house under construction.......

[bigdaddy45]

so now the owner of the house being built is acting suspiciously also?? Maybe him and Arbery were in cahoots to set up the shooters. Have you looked at that angle?