Posted on 05/09/2020 12:53:40 PM PDT by Jess Kitting
On Friday Fox News host Tucker Carlson said that Schiff should resign over the “elaborate and intentional” Russia hoax that alleged that President Donald Trump and his campaign colluded with Russia to help him win the 2016 presidential election.
Special prosecutor Robert Mueller found, after a lengthy investigation, that there was no evidence to support that theory.
But for the better part of a year Schiff said that there was evidence that he had seen that would prove there was collusion. That evidenced was never seen.
“On Thursday the House Intelligence Committee … finally released 57 transcripts of testimony delivered to the committee behind closed doors during the Russia investigation,” he said on his show “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”
“What do the transcripts reveal? We’re not going to ask you to trust us on this one, it’s too important. Instead, we’re going to quote from the transcripts directly,”
Carlson went on to quote members of former President Obama’s administration, former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
The evidence also showed that CrowdStrike CEO Shawn Henry spoke to Schiff in private and told him that there was no evidence of collusion, but the representative pressed on with his sham impeachment.
“Adam Schiff heard those words directly, he heard them from the one person who would know for certain,” the Fox News host said. “Schiff knew there was nothing substantial at the core of the Russian collusion story.”
“At the very center, it was hollow, it was a sham. But Schiff never suggested this in public. Instead, he did the opposite. He spent years on television telling you it was totally real, shut up,”
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativebrief.com ...
Time to also remove the impeachment from the records.
Just use the Report Abuse link and have it removed and the rewrite it.
I rejoiced the day Anthony Wiener was disgraced. Shiff’s fall will surpass that. They both set my “disgust radar” off with their Sunday morning political talk show appearances.
Yeah ... if you think his eyes bug out now that would really make them pop.
He wants to replace sneaky Dianne Feinstein, but Gavin Newsome would appoint himself, given the chance.
Uh yeah, sure it is.
Seems to me for me to do that for as many typos that I make would abuse of the reporting abuse link! I’d have to report myself!
You nailed it.
Resigning is not good enough. He needs to face a firing squad. But unfortunately I have poop in one hand and wishful thinking in the other. Schiff stinks like the poop in the hand.
The only way that Sniveling Little Schitt is gonna leave DC is if they drag him out feet first.There’s no way he’ll be voted out of office (representing Kalifornia’s very filthiest cretins) and resignation...well,he’d have to have a conscience to consider it so *that* ain’t gonna happen.
Maybe he will die in a plane crash or an attempted robbery gone wrong or maybe Covid.
I don’t think Tucker knows how these things work.
It would take something salacious like Weiner did to get rid of him.
Ed Buck is a good friend and going on trial soon.
Maybe we get lucky from that.
Adumb Schitt!
He will NEVER resign....They will have to DRAG him out.....I would pay BIG MONEY to see that!!
It takes two-thirds of the House to expel a member. He could be convicted and remain a Congressman. We’re not talking the cowardly GOP here.
Thanks. Not the kind of stuff I pay close attention to.
Thanks. If the Rats stay in power, he is more likely to become Speaker of the House one day, than resign. He sets the example they want to follow, not repent from.
You got that right, the Democrats always stick together.
Who is going to make him resign ... the Democrat House majority?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.