Equating the climate change models with the virus models is a sure indication you understand neither.
Romans is irrelevant in the current context
Well, the similarity is that they are thrown out with wild abandon as “fact” & must be followed or disaster will strike.
Put out with no error bars, no caveats nothing other then “its all true!”. My “stats” prof would have given them all of them “F’s” from Michael Mann to Phil Jones to Fauci to Ferguson to Brix!
If Climate change models are 100% wrong and they change the dates and they are 100% wrong, why would I believe the virus models would even be 10% right? Then they change the numbers by a factor of 100, and they prove wrong. I believe an educated guess by Trump has more value than the so called "scientists". 70 % 0f the whole world is using HCQ to treat their sick and half say it works and the other half says it kills people. I wonder if the Lupus patients know they are really dead after taking this poison for decades? How many soldiers truly died after taking Quinine before going to duty in a Malaria country? Science depends on data. How can so many interpret data wrong? It has to do with an agenda rather than data. If you look at the data on global warming it says we are basically flat for the last 10 years. The Ozone hole got bigger 30 years after R12 was banned. Could it be that Dupont wanted a new patent for 134A and convinced Congress to support them? Is John Lott's data on guns right, or is Nancy Pelosi right?