Posted on 05/02/2020 1:40:59 PM PDT by Kaslin
A leaked document from the "Five Eyes" intelligence alliance – made up of the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand – shows China purposefully hid and/or destroyed evidence about the Wuhan coronavirus. Specifically, the alliance said the Chinese Communist Party's cover-up can be described as an "assault on international transparency."
Australia's The Saturday Telegraph obtained a copy of the 15-page report which concluded China put other countries in grave danger by covering up different aspects of the coronavirus, including the fact that it can be transmitted from human-to-human, doctors magically "disappearing" when trying to talk about the virus and destroying evidence. China also refused to provide samples of the virus to scientists around the globe who are currently working on a vaccine.
The regime also censored various terms from search engines, including "SARS variation," “Wuhan Seafood market” and “Wuhan Unknown Pneumonia" back in December. A few days later, China’s National Health Commission ordered all samples of the coronavirus to be destroyed or moved to specific testing facilities. The regime issued a "no-publication" order about the virus.
The Saturday Telegraph provided this timeline of important dates showing China's blatant coverup:
November 9, 2015:
Wuhan Institute of Virology publish a study revealing they created a new virus in the lab from SARS-CoV.
December 6, 2019
Five days after a man linked to Wuhan’s seafood market presented pneumonia-like symptoms, his wife contracts it, suggesting human to human transmission.
December 27
China’s health authorities told a novel disease, then affecting some 180 patients, was caused by a new coronavirus.
December 26-30
Evidence of new virus emerges from Wuhan patient data.
December 31
Chinese internet authorities begin censoring terms from social media such as Wuhan Unknown Pneumonia.
January 1, 2020
Eight Wuhan doctors who warned about new virus are detained and condemned.
January 3
China’s top health authority issues a gag order.
January 5
Wuhan Municipal Health Commission stops releasing daily updates on new cases. Continues until January 18.
January 10
PRC official Wang Guangfa says outbreak “under control” and mostly a “mild condition”.
January 12
Professor Zhang Yongzhen’s lab in Shanghai is closed by authorities for “rectification”, one day after it shares genomic sequence data with the world for the first time.
January 14
PRC National Health Commission chief Ma Xiaowei privately warns colleagues the virus is likely to develop into a major public health event.
January 24
Officials in Beijing prevent the Wuhan Institute of Virology from sharing sample isolates with the University of Texas.
February 6
China’s internet watchdog tightens controls on social media platforms.
February 9
Citizen-journalist and local businessman Fang Bin disappears.
April 17
Wuhan belatedly raises its official fatalities by 1290.
Australia is still under the impression that the coronavirus began in a wet market in Wuhan. The United States believes it's more probable that the coronavirus started in a lab in Wuhan. It is believed that China was attempting to "demonstrate that its efforts to identify and combat viruses are equal to or greater than the capabilities of the United States."
When that news broke a few weeks ago, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo slammed China for failing to alert the world about the Wuhan coronavirus.
"What we do know is we know that this virus originated in Wuhan, China. We know there is the Wuhan Institute of Virology just a handful of miles away from where the wet market was," Pompeo previously told Fox News' Martha MacCallum. "There is still lots to learn. The United States government is working diligently to figure it out."
Despite the United States' theories, Yuan Zhiming, the Director of the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, has said that there's no way the virus escaped from his lab. Suggesting that is a "conspiracy theory."
"As people who carry out viral studies, we clearly know what kind of research is going on at the institute and how the institute manages viruses and samples," Zhiming said. "As we said early on, there's no way this virus came from us. We have a strict regulatory regiment. We have a code of conduct for research so we are confident of that."
Surely that’s an error on the year of the first timeline date.
The reason the only reason China would cover up a pandemic, and there is no rational reason, is that they were doing bioweapons research, which would have dire international consequences for China.
That is the date the Bat Lady engineered a new virus with UNC Chapel Hill.
And where are the timelines when flights were allowed to depart to various countries throughout the world.
No. I believe that’s the same chimera published previously which caused controversy.
2015?
Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate
The creation of a chimeric SARS-like virus has scientists discussing the risks of gain-of-function research.
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502
I want to know why we aren’t hearing from gary Crameri at Geelong
Baric and his team demonstrated that the newly-identified SARS-like virus, labeled SHC014-CoV and found in the Chinese horseshoe bats, can jump between bats and humans. They showed that the virus can latch onto and use the same human and bat cellular receptor for entry. The virus also replicates in primary human lung cells, the preferred target for infection.
“This virus is highly pathogenic, and treatments developed against the original SARS virus in 2002 and the ZMapp drugs used to fight Ebola fail to neutralize and control this particular virus,”
Thanks.... didn’t have that info.
Yes, 2015
In the journal article it shows that UNC worked with the Wuhan Lab to create this Chimera virus.
Yes because the ChiComs would be in VIOLATION of the international biological weapons ban treaty. Because of this, it is pretty much worthless.
I posted the letter sent to Chapel Hill from the Govt about this study
Gain of function studies were outlawed but he was allowed to continue because of start date. He was working with Bat Lady. Cant remember if Linfa Wang was on that study
So now I know why they first came out denying the bio lab connection.
I wonder what Ralph S. Baric, the guy who designed experiments and wrote the original Nature Medicine paper in 2015 (https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985.pdf?origin=ppub), has to say about the whole debacle? He sure has the knowledge and expertise to comment on the virus origin and the rest. Haven’t seen his name being mentioned lately...
We’ve been saying this for a long time. Notice that every page research has found has added disclaimers at the top (editors notes). Someone was trying ti do cleanup but in doing so left a trail to follow. Idiots. The editor notes... who made them? You know what Im talking about.
More info on that, please!!
From now on we should call the "WHO" the "WETHO":
"World Except Taiwan Health Organinization"
Because that's what it is.
Now let's compare the records of the WETHO and the Taiwan Health Organization:
WETHO: 0
THO: 1
So which one should the US join up with and give 500 million to?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.