Posted on 05/01/2020 9:26:40 AM PDT by billorites
The more we learn about the evils done to Michael Flynn, and they increase day by day, the more the FBI comes to resemble the KGB.
Or is it the earlier version, the NKVD, whose leader Lavrentiy Beria famously declared Show me the man and Ill find you the crime.
James Comeythe head of the FBI during this period of extraordinary moral turpitudenever said anything anywhere near that pithy or memorable but he did Beria one better. He, with Peter Strzok, whose feckless emails to his paramour continue to amaze, and various other bit playerssome revealed others yet to be revealedof this sorry saga, didnt just find a crime, they invented one.
In all fairness, the Soviets, pre and post-Beria, often did the same, putting the darkness in Darkness at Noon with forced confessions as in the Metro-Vickers Affair (1933) when innocent Brits took the hit for the failure of Stalins Five-Year Plan.
What was really going on with what was essentially the forced confession of Michael Flynn?
Attorney Andrew C. McCarthy said on Tucker Carlson Thursday night that Flynn wasnt the target. It was Trump. Flynn was just a seasoned intelligence professional (McCarthys words) who had to be implicated and put out of the way in order to reach the president, the real bulls eye.
Thats likely true, but its also likely that wasnt the only reason. Flynn was by himself a target.
During the transition, it is said Obama gave Trump two pieces of advice on whom he considered to be the current greatest threats to the United States, so the new president could be forearmedKim Jong-un and Michael Flynn.
Michael Flynn? (Id add several exclamation points and question marks, but its tacky.). Why would he be of anywhere near that importance to be put in the same conversation as the nuclear-armed dictator of North Korea?
The answer, I believe, is a four letter word: Iran.
The Iran Deal (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA) was, with the Affordable Care Act, one of the twin pillars of Obamas presidency on which he wanted to base his legacy.
Im not going into here the many theories of why, beyond that legacy, Obama was so attached to the JCPOA, but, by the time Trump was elected, it was already under heavy criticism due to the Islamic Republics violent activities in the Syrian civil war and elsewhere, arming Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and other proxies with moneys that came via America andnaive as it now soundswere supposed to be for the improvement of the lives of the Iranian people.
Flynn was known to have been one of the most adamant opponents of the Iran Deal within the Obama administration in the first place and, with his military record as a three-star general plus aforementioned intelligence expertise, perhaps the most powerful one.
So bringing down Flynn was a two-for, striking a blow at the new president while hopefully helping to preserve the Iran Deal. The second part didnt work, but the first did for a while.
Its therefore not totally surprisingwhat is these days?that the newly-revealed documents have SCO (Special Counsels Office) scrawled on them, among other incriminating notes indicating a setup was in the cards for Flynn.
That means these statements exculpating Trumps newly-appointed National Security Adviser went to Muellers office where someone (Mueller? Weissman?) ignored them and continued with what Trump has colloquially, and I think too loosely, branded a hoax. It was far more than that. It was a form of defenestration.
When we look for the Mr. Big in all this, as we are tempted to do aswe can be more confident now more rolls out, we should not settle for James Comey, as culpable as he may be. This bizarre character who self-identified on Twitter as the theologian Reinhold Niebuhr is not the end to the story.
We are looking at a Netflix series with a plot that gets increasingly complicated. It goes past Comey and into the intelligence agencies and the State Departmenta real life version of Scandal with, I regret to tell show runner Shonda Rhymes, the liberals and progressives almost always the villains.
When it reaches Brennan and Obama, it may not even end there. Maybe even John Durham doesnt know. (Kidding. I hope.)
It also looks like they wanted him out before he blew the whistle on Crossfire Wind (Carter Page’s FISA case).
Makes sense why Gen Flynn was targeted.
Obama’s handiwork.
Boy O Boy, would I love that.
I’d like to be proud of Gen. Flynn.
But would somebody with commonsense explain:
How did Gen. Flynn “accidentally” lie to the VP?
He would have blown the lid off the corruption of the FBI, CIA and all the other agencies.
He was going to do a complete audit of every intelligence agency ... gun running, drugs, human trafficking, etc., etc., etc, ...
I feel like I am in a dream. Although they are discounted by people, talk radio hosts had this on two years ago. Many of us discussed it on FR—Manafort,Flynn & Stone terrorized and bullied to make them turn against Trump with false testimony. They refused. That’s news now?
Like I’m reading “Shock news: Hillary committed felonies and media covered them up for her.” That’s news?
“defenestration” - a new word for me.
From dictionary.com: the act of throwing a thing or especially a person out of a window.
Who would thunk?
My last post (link) is why Flynn HAD to be prosecuted. To back up Comey’s memos that the President said Flynn was a good guy...and should be let off the hook (Or so Comey said he said).
Wow, excellent read. Thanks for posting it, and giving me occasion to consult my Webster’s re the precise meaning of “defenestration”:)!
Great word to capture what the 0 and his Deep State did to General Flynn!
btt
Wow, did my post before I saw yours.
Cool word, no?
** How did Gen. Flynn accidentally lie to the VP? **
Don’t know for sure, but it appears to be the same *Gotcha* that the FBI used — the chance meeting with the Russian ambassador. Probably the lies are one-and-the-same. 2 counts related to the same incident.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defenestrations_of_Prague
The event that touched of The Thirty Years War in Europe. Very bloody.
OMB its that simple
Thanks for posting the whole article.
I generally ignore Epoch Times, as you need to sign up for contd reading. And Ditto to others doing same.
The biggest question that is seldom if ever asked, is what did Obama know about all of this? Did he only learn about it after he read about it in the paper? When did he find out about all the misbehaviors? Did he approve?
Believe me, there are people who know what he knew, and when he knew it.
There he stands all spic and span.......lol!
Remember that Flynn worked for Obama. Obama was probably afraid that he knew too much to let him be in Trumps inner circle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.