Posted on 04/29/2020 8:29:45 AM PDT by jagusafr
Excerpt: "San Antonio should prioritize the needs of those most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic by focusing response and recovery efforts in low-income communities, communities of color (Latinx/Hispanic, Black/African American, Indigenous and Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, etc.), and LGBTQIA+ communities. This is an intersectional strategy that ensures that all who are highest risk are reached, including people with disabilities, the medically vulnerable, low wage frontline workers, imprisoned individuals, housing insecure individuals, seniors, and many others., as when these individuals are also low-income and/or from communities of color they are the most at risk. We recognize that we have not distinctly named all of groups of people who are disenfranchised, but they are all included, as we use the term marginalized populations to explicitly refer to the communities most at risk due to systems and structures of oppression."
(Excerpt) Read more at files.constantcontact.com ...
“LGBTQIA+”
Admittedly, I don’t pay too much attention to the alphabet people... but what’s the “I” and “A” stand for? What special snowflakes are they? (Honest question, I don’t know.)
BS. Talk about ‘race preference’.
Does this document address the dozens of deaths among the elderly at nursing homes like Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
Didn’t think so.
Better to focus on how this affects queers.
So if some jurisdictions are banning large sodas, smoking here or there, etc. because it is bad for our health... Why not ban or similarly discourage other behaviors (ie. sexual perversions) that compromise peoples’ health? Seems like a double standard to me. Oh, but then, that’s the left for you...
Maybe white people need to unite, support each other and quit paying any city taxes they can.
And send this destructive behavior all the way to the SCOTUS.
Go down to pages 28 and 29 of the report and read about the risk factors for certain activities. Theaters have medium risk while places of worship of high risk. I am surprised a bunch of pro-gay people would rate those events that way.
If this continues, in less than 100 years America will just be another socialist 3rd world country.
Opps, they forgot “S”, for Snowflake. Glad you reminded me, because I get lost in all the letters. I think there are 27 letters since there are 52 states now.
Vote all these idiotic bassturds out.
The battle cry is: “REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!!!”
Not one single, solitary vote for any democrat anywhere for anything...from dog catcher on up....nada, zilch.
Also, look at page 30 and read the risk factor for large social gatherings. It is completely different than what is charted for religious gatherings. Bias we much?
More men and women have been killed by Covid19 than all other genders combined.
I remember the 1980s when San Antonio was a nice place to visit. Visited a couple of years ago and I’ll NEVER go again! Weird city.
😳😷
Nor do I. And, further, don’t care. There are two sexes and an ever-increasing multitude of perversions of those two sexes.
Who is John Galt?
I noticed. I interpreted it as trying to keep Christians from meeting together under the guise of safety.
“I” = “Inbred?”
“A” = “Animal?”
May I humbly suggest that they simplify such edicts and use the acronym: E B S W Everybody But Straight Whites.
” Intersex, Asexual “
Ah, OK. Got to be inclusive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.