What does this say about the possibility of a vaccine? Doesn’t this news pull the rug out from under vaccination? “No antibodies” means “no antibodies”, right?
“not necessarily”
F’n qualifier so the MSM can print total B.S.
This virus is not necessarily all that dangerous.
We should all know by now how reliable both the WHO and CNN has been with information.
So how are people surviving COVI-19 if they don’t have antibodies killing it? Are we all supposed to live on a cocktail of WHO approved drugs for the rest of our lives? They trying to turn us into Eloi?
Ok maybe the immunity is not 100%. Think of it like the common cold. Our bodies know how to fight that even if it’s not 100% immunity.
I don’t care what W.H.O. has to say regarding any subject. Their job was to prevent pandemics. They failed on multiple levels. Now they’re just noise.
They fight at every front and fall back to the next position.
Isn’t spreading from person to person.
No need to shut down travel
It wasnt made in a lab
It will kill millions
HCQ, zinc and a Z-pack doesn’t work
And NOW, “no immunity from the disease”.... so lemme guess, we need to stay shut down a long long time, and we will only be safe when we take the Gates vaccine?
It doesn’t say anything it says they don’t know.
“WHO says no evidence of Covid-19 immunity from antibodies”
OTOH, there’s no evidence to the contrary, that is no evidence AGAINST C-19 antibodies conferring immunity ...
(and the South Korea BS doesn’t count, because the SK tests are nearly worthless given the high rate of false positives AND false negatives)
“The World Health Organization is warning that people who have had Covid-19 are not necessarily immune...”
***************************************************************
United Nations Psyops misinformation.... probably put out at the request of the DNC.
The WHO seem to be totally evidence/data free.
Time to stop funding them.
F WHO
If it doesn’t build antibodies then pushing for a vaccine would be useless. Exposure builds antibodies against any invader. Whether or not the resistance remains active depends on the virus. This is the reason we get yearly flu and pneumonia shots. This is also why there are the antibody test kits being distributed and used. Any proclamation that comes from WHO, Fauci or the Scarf are suspect from the start and coming by way of CNN makes them instant fake news.
I want to know where the idea that asymptomatic people could spread the virus came from. It was already known, or stated by “experts” previously, that SARS was not spread by those with no symptoms. Can someone tell me?
Saw this earlier today, and thought that the change in tone from them was really strange. They’re probably right — as in there are no statistically provable studies that can “prove” the immunity.
But that sure is the way to bet, as it is the case with most viruses, and almost all corona viruses that we know abouitt.
But my question for them, if there’s some doubt about immunity, what makes this virus so special, hmmmm? Maybe something to do with a lab in Wuhan?
Something’s fishy.
The World Health Organization is warning that people who have had Covid-19 are not necessarily immune by the presence of ...
The structure of this sentence suggests that WHO doesn't have a clue as to the verity or balderdash of their statement. I would have been better if they had said nothing, because this "warning" adds nothing to the discussion.
Yes, it's time to treat their statements as noise.
I saw this CNN report a few hours ago at the top of the list of important news stories as compiled by BING. I apologize for not naming Bill Gates as one of the co-conspirators. BING is his thing.