Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MV=PY

My personal opinion was we could have done just fine dealing with this in the same way as has been done every epidemic before “tests”. If you go back I remarked at the time that “testing” didn’t make a lot of sense, it just introduced confusion and chaos unnecessarily but somebody decided to offer tests to everybody and it was a political football after that. Now notice “testing” has been handed of laterally to the Governors which was a very wise move. Let them deal with demands form the media.


50 posted on 04/19/2020 6:41:36 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute

You could certainly be right about this round.

Of course, with that approach, the problem would present itself in the form of a virus that wiped out 75% of the population.

Is it best to err on the side of safety? Sure. Do we need nanny government to create rules to dictate citizen’s behavior?

That’s where I have a problem.


54 posted on 04/19/2020 6:47:29 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson