Replies

> “the genomes of viruses are relatively simple”

The genome of the SARS-COV-2 is an RNA molecule of about 30,000.

If 30,000 bases is simple to you, I can introduce you to some PhD level sequence analysts that you could help in simplifying their work.

Their sets of equations to date are encoded into analysis software that has great utility in many contexts such as mutability but is always in a process of incorporating new factors and contexts to help in understanding the characteristics of such molecules.

As you are positing that these sequences are simple, you should be ushered into their offices and conference rooms where you can present your methods of simplification.

I am quite certain your enlightening presentation could be welcome.

Over the length of its 30,000-base-pair genome, SARS-COV-2 accumulates an average of about one mutation per month where each mutation is on the order of 1 to 2 base pairs (bp).

The discovery of HIV inserts in the SARS-COV-2 reported by Professor Montagnier and Biomathematician Jean-Claude Perez working together found homologous HIV strands in the range of 120 to 160 bp occurring in multiples at various locations of the SARS-COV-2 genome.

As the Professor is a Nobel Laureate and the biomathematician is a product of France which has a long history of producing some of the world’s greatest mathematicians, I tend to think they saw something statistically significant unless they were hallucinating. Perhaps they should be arrested and interrogated for which hallucinogens they ingested before analyzing these dangerous ‘natural and novel’ viral genomes. If any illicit drug use is found or suspected to have occurred, their findings should be stricken immediately in parallel with informing CNN.

Now, it is true that economists (yes, economists) have reported they have debunked the claim that SARS-COV-2 is engineered. Such economists say that conspiracy theorists base wild claims of engineering on apparent insertions of HIV sequences and other glycoproteins. I have heard nothing of the econometric theories they used in debunking the uniqueness of the HIV sequence inserts and for full disclosure, I don’t use recreational drugs and I would never say these economists use illicit drugs for fear I might have strangers knock on my door and invite me to go hiking in the woods at night.

Perhaps the economists that weighed in were detecting Gilead Science receptors in the SARS-COV-2 using their econometric equations and analysis software and found such receptors would interact with one of Gilead’s untested vaccines containing possibly hundreds of billions of sequences measured in dollar units. For such economists delving into virology, we can agree their expertise in dollar sequences would be of great utility in debunking drug crazed theories of engineered corona viruses especially by Nobel Laureates in molecular biology.

It never ceases to amaze how many conspiracy theorists are allowed to interfere with pharma companies like Gilead Sciences using superior econometric models applied to virology with the virtuous goal of helping investors. Gilead is just trying to help improve the economy for people and yet we see crazy hallucinating cretinous charlatans posing as virus experts getting in the way of a good deed.

Let’s see if we can get such anonymous conspiracy debunkers like Brooklyn Attitude into see the CEO of Gilead to enlighten the Gilead econometricians on how simple it is to prove that HIV inserts into SARS-COV-2 are virtually impossible.

Sounds like a plan.