[DoodleBob]

I've read him for years. His general sentiments are usually spot-on, and his underlying premise in most of his pieces on the Church and Truth are correct.

But his omnipresent arrogance is simply too much. The best description I ever read of him was the self-appointed Pope.

I may be willing to grant him a slip or two as you hint. In this piece, however, his flip and sloppy writing and factual inaccuracies are many and they wreck his credibility. I can totally get behind a debate on the pros and cons of snuffing out a yuge portion of the economy to eradicate a virus. But this article doesn't advance that discourse.

[Shethink13]

I've read him for years. His general sentiments are usually spot-on, and his underlying premise in most of his pieces on the Church and Truth are correct.

But his omnipresent arrogance is simply too much. The best description I ever read of him was the self-appointed Pope.

Thank you for your very civil and informed response, which I really didn't deserve as I was a bit snarky.

I owe you an apology as I read the article you linked and I haven't a clue what side of the issue in question he is on. Way too convoluted and wordy. You are absolutely correct in your assessment. Forgive my ignorance.

Regards!