Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lockbar

Any solution should be utilized only in a healthcare setting with direct monitoring by a clinical professional. While it cannot replace an FDA-approved ICU ventilator, in terms of functionality, flexibility, and clinical efficacy, the MIT E-Vent is anticipated to have utility in helping free up existing supply or in life-or-death situations when there is no other option.

Further, any low-cost ventilator system must take great care regarding providing clinicians with the ability to closely control and monitor tidal volume, inspiratory pressure, bpm, and I/E ratio, and be able to provide additional support in the form of PEEP, PIP monitoring, filtration, and adaptation to individual patient parameters. We recognize, and would like to highlight for anyone seeking to manufacture a low-cost emergency ventilator, that failing to properly consider these factors can result in serious long-term injury or death.


38 posted on 04/07/2020 6:52:21 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator

How many patients could a single respiratory tech monitor if he/she had to manually look after all those parameters? 2? 5? 10?

I’d think the person monitoring those things manually would go batty in short order.


41 posted on 04/07/2020 6:59:13 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson