Posted on 04/06/2020 7:24:03 PM PDT by naturalman1975
Finally, despite the worst efforts of Victoria Police, Victorias legal system, and the medias smear factory, Cardinal George Pell has had his conviction overturned by the High Court.
The full judgment can be read here. A refers to the choirboy and B to his deceased fellow chorister. Below some key elements of that unanimous ruling:
57. In this Court, the respondent correctly noted that a number of the claimed improbabilities raise the same point. It remains that acceptance of As account of the first incident requires finding that: (i) contrary to the applicants practice, he did not stand on the steps of the Cathedral greeting congregants for ten minutes or longer; (ii) contrary to long-standing church practice, the applicant returned unaccompanied to the priests sacristy in his ceremonial vestments; (iii) from the time A and B re-entered the Cathedral, to the conclusion of the assaults, an interval of some five to six minutes, no other person entered the priests sacristy; and (iv) no persons observed, and took action to stop, two robed choristers leaving the procession and going back into the Cathedral.
58. It suffices to refer to the evidence concerning (i), (ii) and (iii) to demonstrate that, notwithstanding that the jury found A to be a credible and reliable witness, the evidence as a whole was not capable of excluding a reasonable doubt as to the applicants guilt.
And there is this:
124. The assumption that a group of choristers, including adults, might have been so preoccupied with making their way to the robing room as to fail to notice the extraordinary sight of the Archbishop of Melbourne dressed in his full regalia advancing through the procession and pinning a 13 year old boy to the wall, is a large one. The failure to make any formal report of such an incident, had it occurred, may be another matter.
No, I didn’t miss it.
I was clarifying our situation here.
I have my own views on exactly what happened in the Pell case, which are pretty specific to that case.
But I won’t go into those at this point.
But I do believe years of prejudice made it impossible to Pell to get a fair trial by jury in Australia, and unfortunately in Victoria (unlike most of Australia) Judge Only trials are not allowed.
“What do that actual victims say?”
There are no victims - except for Archbishop Pell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.