Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen

Why would Trump give a hang about Democrat voters voting in a Democrat primary?


8 posted on 04/06/2020 6:30:07 PM PDT by M.K. Borders (All I require of my government is the liberty my Grandfathers were born to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

Thank God. The lower court was going to let the rats harvest ballots 6 days AFTER the election. They would know exactly how many votes they would have to “find”. Did the The Hill even mention that part? On the face this ruling does not favor either party. The fact that this rat is so upset tell you the SC has ruined the plan. This is just the beginning the rats are going to use this virus to try cheat in November
to a degree we cannot even imagine. The people hold the rats in contempt now and they can feel it.


29 posted on 04/06/2020 6:47:48 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: M.K. Borders

What you need to understand is that these antics by our illustrious low energy governor and the Obama federal judge have nothing to do with the demon-crap primary and everything to do with the state Supreme Court election. The Democrats were counting on their usual advantage in early voting and mail-in ballots. We all know why that happens. Early in the season they also thought that the Democrat primary would provide a huge liberal turnout for the liberal SC candidate. As it so happens, the primary is already essentially settled. Later, when Corona came along, they knew that in-person voting on Tuesday would be all screwed up because of fear and lack of election officials, so the in-person voting that normally favors conservatives would instead produce a very low turnout. So, they were still in favor of letting the election stand as scheduled tomorrow. Late last week things started going sideways for them. The mail-in ballots were coming in heavily from traditionally red districts, and not so much from liberal Madison and Milwaukee counties. In their panic, they went to a federal Obama judge and he ruled that they had an extra week after the election to “count” dead peeople and whoever else they could muster from the 200,000 extra people that are on Wisconsin’s voter rolls. Of course a federal judge has no jurisdiction in a Wisconsin constitutional matter; but you know how Liberal judges are. In a related court case; our handpuppet libtard low energy governor Tony Evers, who never seems to know why he makes the decisions his handlers make for him, tried cancelling the election today and moving it to June, allowing for mail-in ballot casting the entire time until then. The Wisconsin supreme court struck him down 4-2, with Judge Kelly, the conservative judge on the ballot, abstaining. If Daniel Kelly triumphs over Lisa Neubauer, it will be another case of a conservative overcoming a vast funding gap. Pray for Trump, Kelly, MAGA, and stay safe.


49 posted on 04/06/2020 7:29:52 PM PDT by RINOphobic (From liberated Wisconsin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: M.K. Borders

It’s not just a primary. The bigger story is that there’s a key Wisconsin Supreme Court seat at stake in this election. I believe their justices are elected to ten-year terms.


51 posted on 04/06/2020 7:31:22 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson