There was no control group in the study so Alam acknowledged more studies are needed to evaluate his protocols effectiveness.
The phrase "NO Control Group" means that no one was 'sacrificed by using a placebo' so that their deaths would count as part of the 'control group'.
NO ONE WANTS TO BE A PART OF THE CONTROL GROUP, I.E. GUINEA PIGS THAT WILL DIE.
IF GIVEN A CHOICE WHO WOULD TAKE A SUGAR PILL?
the control group does not have to be non treated patients although there are some that would refuse treatment or not qualify for some other reason. the control groups could be different treatment or doses. Ultimately randomized studies are important for bandwagon is not always correct even when rolling along at high speed. Look up a drug called xigris for a recent example. That one was going to end sepsis deaths. Turned out we were killing people faster with if.
Good for you.
Precisely correct. In a pandemic, you cannot ethically form a control group. Case history and careful control of the other measures you use are sufficient. For example, start your treatment with the recommended protocol - don’t start with something else and then switch (unless the patient’s life is in danger).
No control group means you dont know if the drug actually helped anyone, or how much it helped. What is the number needed to treat (NNT) to save one life? 10? 500? You also dont know if the deaths or ICU admissions could have been from the drug. It can cause arrhythmias and severe hypoglycemia, both of which can be deadly.
I could be wrong but I don’t believe those in the control group are aware they are in it.
Someone should point this out to Fauci. He may carry MD somewhere after his name but he is far more a eesearcher than a doctor. That’s true if most of the CDC FDA people. I know some have reservations about them but the USPHS is made up of doctors and nurses who do practice. Maybe they should be making these decisions about treatment.