Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SSI, SS beneficiaries no longer need to file for COVID-19 stimulus checks
Salinas Californian ^ | April 2, 2020 | Kate Cimini

Posted on 04/03/2020 6:22:33 AM PDT by artichokegrower

In order to receive their COVID-19 stimulus checks, social security and supplemental security income beneficiaries no longer have to file tax returns, the Internal Revenue Service decided.

(Excerpt) Read more at thecalifornian.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
I thought that the stimulus program was to create financial relief to those who lost income because their jobs went away due to the coronavirus epidemic. Social Security and SSI recipients have lost none of their monthly income due to the crisis. Why would they qualify for monetary assistance?
1 posted on 04/03/2020 6:22:33 AM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Well, there’s also that $1,200 one-time payment that everyone gets up to certain income limits. That’s what this is about.

Incidentally if you do qualify, you are still much better off going ahead and filing your return. You’ll get the 1200 much quicker.


2 posted on 04/03/2020 6:25:33 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Why would they qualify for monetary assistance?

It's a plan to stimulate the economy by increasing the money supply for all, which will increase aggregate demand, which will increase aggregate sales revenues.

3 posted on 04/03/2020 6:28:41 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I paid into the system until I was 74. And since the last 8 COLAs put $3 total in my SS check, I could really use the money. My car is 16 years old and inspection is a high stress time and I need cataract surgery on my other eye which has now been put off until fall.


4 posted on 04/03/2020 6:30:34 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

That was not what was decided. If you receive a social security payment that is not subject to income tax then you don’t have file a return to receive the stimulus.

Social Security benefits are taxable unless they are under a certain amount.


5 posted on 04/03/2020 6:33:01 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Although we are a retired couple, we agree.

In addition, most government workers will not lose a dime so should not get a stimulus check either.

6 posted on 04/03/2020 6:39:56 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (So, Wuhan China had a Bio-weapons Lab...who knew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman
There is an income limit attached. A social security recipient scraping by on $2,000 a month is certainly deserves to get a check. A social security recipient who also has a retirement check coming in and is above the income limit won't get a check.

If you believe the income limit is too high, then that is a debate worth having. But a blanket statement that social security recipients should not get a check is ridiculous.

7 posted on 04/03/2020 6:53:08 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

Social Security payments are taxable unless your total income is under a certain amount.


8 posted on 04/03/2020 6:53:50 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame

Yes. I know that from personal experience. Many here assume otherwise.


9 posted on 04/03/2020 7:09:22 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FtrPilot

I am 67 and still working full time at an “essential job” agriculture and am not receiving Social Security payments other than Medicare. I still pay plenty into both programs. I will not receive a stimulus check. My point is that those receiving Social Security benefits have not had their income reduced due to the crisis. They are not like the restaurant worker who lost a job and all income and needs the stimulus payment. This program is robbing Peter to pay Paul in a grand scale. Unfortunately Peter in this case will be the grandchildren of these Social Security recipients who will be stuck with the bill


10 posted on 04/03/2020 7:23:11 AM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

“”” I will not receive a stimulus check. My point is that those receiving Social Security benefits have not had their income reduced due to the crisis.”””””””””””

Untrue. MANY SS recipients work part time jobs to make ends meet. Many of those jobs are gone now.


11 posted on 04/03/2020 7:47:41 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Plus, if your spouse doesn’t get SS, you need the return done in order to get that $1200.


12 posted on 04/03/2020 7:59:06 AM PDT by ozaukeemom (9/11/01 Never Forget. Never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

My Chevy truck is 44 years old & my Buick station wagon is 41 years old. Still driving both.


13 posted on 04/03/2020 8:16:18 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
I sincerely hope that your “essential job” is not needlessly exposing you to Covid-19. Stay safe.

It is my understanding, and I could be wrong, that the relief package includes a supplement for the unemployed. So, an unemployed restaurant worker will get an unemployment check and a supplement so their "income" essentially stays the same. This is in addition to the $1200 check.

It is likely that there a lot of people who don't need the check but will get a check. There is nothing you or I can do about that.

14 posted on 04/03/2020 8:21:20 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
I thought that the stimulus program was to create financial relief to those who lost income because their jobs went away due to the corona virus epidemic.

People who lost jobs qualify for unemployment insurance that will be enhanced by as much as $600 a week, not to mention food stamps etc. The misnamed stimulus is for people to immediately pump cash into the economy .... even though we are in lock down.

15 posted on 04/03/2020 8:42:18 AM PDT by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
I thought that the stimulus program was to create financial relief to those who lost income because their jobs went away due to the coronavirus epidemic. Social Security and SSI recipients have lost none of their monthly income due to the crisis. Why would they qualify for monetary assistance?

I have exactly the same question.

16 posted on 04/03/2020 10:13:52 AM PDT by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I paid into the system until I was 74. And since the last 8 COLAs put $3 total in my SS check, I could really use the money. My car is 16 years old and inspection is a high stress time and I need cataract surgery on my other eye which has now been put off until fall.

None of which has anything to do with the issue at hand. Enjoy my money. You're welcome!

17 posted on 04/03/2020 10:14:56 AM PDT by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

This stimulus has two goals 1)helping those that are out of work due to the virus 2) help the economy by giving people money to spend. That’s why they are giving it to everyone under a certain income limit. Those people are most likely to spend it.


18 posted on 04/03/2020 10:18:02 AM PDT by OIFVeteran ( "Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!" Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I would like to add the real life experience of a friend of mine who is on SS. He is around 80 and has been retired for about 15 years. I am confident that there are a lot of people on SS who are struggling just like he is.

"In the 8 years Jug Ears was in power, we got NO SS COL increases-—and gas was $5 a gallon.

Apparently, the ‘formula’ for COL doesn’t include gas costs & other daily items.

My current increase added $19 to my prior amount of $1188 to bring me to current amount of $1207. My basic land line phone bill has literally gone up as much or close to as much as my increase!!! AND I am on a ‘senior plan’ with AT & T.

Everything electronic has built in obsolescence and don’t even think about buying a newer vehicle.

Groceries keep going up & up due to union worker costs, and Obama kicked almost every tire company out of the USA. They went to China, and then Obama added an additional 25% tariff to tires coming from China. A tire I used to buy for $75-80 now costs $130-135. AND- -— They are engineered to NOT last much more than 5 years. IF you have a nail in a tire over 5 years old, the tire shop is forbidden by law to repair it-—it is considered TOO OLD. Thanks Obama.

A new truck is over $65,000 and while they might get better mileage than my current truck, registration & insurance more than makes up for those savings. Plus- my current vehicles DO NOT have computers running everything, so I can actually work on it with help from a neighbor. Neither of my vehicles have the fuel pump INSIDE the gas tank. They both have pumps bolted to the outside of the engines. Getting a fuel pump replaced in a current car can run well over $500. Tank has to be REMOVED from vehicle. 1979 Buick station wagon with 403 Olds engine needed a fuel pump 3 years ago. Cost me $22 at Summit Racing Parts, and took about 1 hour to change with neighbor doing most of the labor.

Obama changed us all over to HD TV-—which meant that the TV in my bedroom- living room- & office didn’t work without a ‘converter’. Left me & others without communications of news. Last ‘converter” I bought lasted only about 13 months. Not much of a value.

Trying to stretch the SS check every month is a giant juggling act some months. AND-—I am a life long bookkeeper!!!!"

It is not just "working folks" that are hurting.

19 posted on 04/03/2020 11:37:27 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
Social Security benefits are taxable unless they are under a certain amount.

But SSI, which is also run through the SS Administration, is non-taxable income.
20 posted on 04/03/2020 6:00:47 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson