Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oral Argument: Duncan v. Becerra (California Magazine Ban).
Ninth Circuit ^ | 04/02/2020 | Ninth Circuit

Posted on 04/02/2020 12:31:28 PM PDT by TexasGurl24

The Oral Arguments in Duncan v. Becerra (The California Magazine Ban) were held today. I have attached the video.

The Judges on the Panel were:

Kenneth K. Lee (Trump Appointee) Barbara M. Lynn (Klintoon Appointee District Judge sitting by designation.) I think, but I am not certain that the third judge is Consuelo Callahan (GWB appointee) but she didn't say her name at the outset. (Can anyone check me on that?)


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/02/2020 12:31:28 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

https://www.reddit.com/r/CAguns/comments/fpmzvm/duncan_v_becerra_mag_ban_case_looks_promising_for/


2 posted on 04/02/2020 12:40:39 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Yeah, it’s Consuelo Callahan.


3 posted on 04/02/2020 12:41:03 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bookmarking


4 posted on 04/02/2020 12:42:44 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Interesting. Barbara Lynn is the chief judge of the Northern District of Texas, in Dallas. It’s not that common for district judges from other circuits to sit on a circuit court panel.


5 posted on 04/02/2020 12:42:57 PM PDT by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

As I am going through this, it looks like Callahan and Lee are on the side of Freedom. They were much tougher in the questioning of the AG.


6 posted on 04/02/2020 12:43:12 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Took me a couple before I realized it is not the paper kind of magazine. Then again I am old!


7 posted on 04/02/2020 12:43:34 PM PDT by SES1066 (Happiness is a depressed Washington, DC housing market!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
The district judge was Roger T. Benitez, Dubya appointee (SD California).

I'll bet Becerra is soiling himself.

8 posted on 04/02/2020 12:43:41 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

That’s good. Callahan has written from a Pro-Second Amendment standpoint in the past.


9 posted on 04/02/2020 12:43:46 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Benitez wrote a great opinion.

A friend knows him pretty well.


10 posted on 04/02/2020 12:48:35 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Magazine ban?

Then a Newspaper ban?

So what is next for Communists?

They want a Mental Thought Ban!


11 posted on 04/02/2020 1:01:04 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Back when I was in high school Roger Benitez was one of the coaches for our Mock Trial team. And his law firm was in the same building as the CPA firm my mother worked for.


12 posted on 04/02/2020 1:03:28 PM PDT by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (Posting from deep within enemy territory - San Jose, CA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

I am REALLY wanting a strike down of a magazine ban (and restrictions) as a violation of the 2nd. If we get that and if supported by SCOTUS, lots of local laws fall apart. I live in Colorado and while our 15 round limit does not really impact pistols, it does do two things.

1) The state assumes it has the authority to limit firearm function and if allowed to stand, 15 rounds will be turned down to 10 and then 5. And other hairbrain magazine restrictions will pop up

2) Overturning the ban would allow for the resumption of self manufactured (3d printed or stamped) magazines.


13 posted on 04/02/2020 1:08:01 PM PDT by taxcontrol (stupid should hurt (Dad's wisdom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; ZirconEncrustedTweezers
This is what FR is great for - personal anecdotes of people in the news.

I'm liking this Judge Roger Benitez more every minute.

14 posted on 04/02/2020 1:16:55 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

bkmk


15 posted on 04/02/2020 3:49:28 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

When will there be a decision from the 9th and will we be able to read it.

Watching this was much appreciated. Thanks for posting it.


16 posted on 04/02/2020 5:17:20 PM PDT by oldenuff35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff35

There is no time limit. I’d suspect several weeks at the earliest for a decision.


17 posted on 04/02/2020 5:34:57 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

does anyone know if they publish transcripts of oral arguments? The Supreme Court does. I couldn’t find it in the 9th Circuit’s page, unless it’s something you have to have PACER for.


18 posted on 04/03/2020 8:18:48 AM PDT by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

I don’t think the Circuit Courts make them readily available like SCOTUS does, but SCOTUS doesn’t allow cameras like the Ninth Circuit does.


19 posted on 04/03/2020 9:51:16 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
I don’t think the Circuit Courts make them readily available like SCOTUS does, but SCOTUS doesn’t allow cameras like the Ninth Circuit does.

Yeah, looks like it. I ended up listening to the vid, which was interesting. Personally, I prefer transcripts, because you can't really search a recording very easily.

20 posted on 04/03/2020 10:26:53 AM PDT by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson