To: Alberta's Child
I can actually see the company’s point if they were doing this to reduce the amount of money they were paying to employees who have been furloughed and are not working. This is basically the company seizing the employee's government check from them.
How would it be different from a company saying they will reduce one's pay by the amount of early social security they start taking?
-PJ
38 posted on
03/31/2020 11:08:20 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: Political Junkie Too
If they are paying an employee who is not working, I’d think they can pretty much dock him whatever they want.
40 posted on
04/01/2020 3:05:21 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson