Here's Something To Ponder.......
Posted on 03/30/2020 3:07:57 PM PDT by Morgana
The slaughter all began in Texas, with Roe v. Wade, with attorneys Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee taking advantage of Norma McCorvey, who never was pregnant, who reported on the attorneys extreme lack of respect for her as a client.
GWB appointee. This particular one has ruled in favor of abortion at least twice.
I thought we had to hold our noses and vote R “for the Judges”?
A GWB judge also played a big role in homo “matrimony”.
No mention of who appointed this terrorist in black robes.I think we all know what that means.
Here's Something To Ponder.......
Background on the judge, a George W. Bushi appointee. Sounds like quite a judicial activist for abortion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Leroy_Yeakel_III
I hear what you are saying, but for the record, what kind of judge would Al Gore or GWB’s primary opponent (John McCain) have appointed?
It’s easy to be a Monday morning quarterback, isn’t it?
Norma McCorvey was pregnant according to her. She never had an abortion even though she won the case.
Ignore this Judge and his stupid order. Slap a Quarantine sticker on the door and arrest anyone who violates it.
Including this joke of a Judge.
L
With the Left’s new found desire to do, or at least silence when it comes to doing, nation-building in the Middle East, I really don’t see that their problem with Bush was all about. I suppose he was a little too moderate for them.
Abortion rulings
On October 28, 2013, Yeakel ruled that abortion restrictions enacted by the state of Texas were unconstitutional, in the case of Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt.[1] Yeakel wrote: “The admitting-privileges provision of House Bill 2 does not bear a rational relationship to the legitimate right of the state in preserving and promoting fetal life or a woman’s health and, in any event, places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her.”
Three days later, Yeakel’s order was mostly overturned by a three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans[3] The part of the law requiring doctors in abortion facilities have admitting privileges at local hospitals was unanimously reinstated by the panel.[3] Only one part of Yeakel’s order remained and that part was where the order prevents the state from enforcing the FDA protocol for abortion-inducing drugs in cases where the woman is between 50 and 63 days into her pregnancy. On August 29, 2014, in response to a second lawsuit, Judge Yeakel ruled again that abortion restrictions in Texas H. B. 2 imposed an “undue burden” upon women seeking pre-viability abortions and upon abortion providers, and declared several provisions of the law unconstitutional.
Yeakel’s rulings were upheld by the United States Supreme Court in June 2016.
In March 2020, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced that abortion providers were covered by a state order that required postponement of non-urgent medical procedures to preserve hospital beds and equipment during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. On March 30, 2020, Yeakel ruled that Paxton’s action “prevents Texas women from exercising what the Supreme Court has declared is their fundamental constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy before a fetus is viable”
Now we see what abortion is all about.
It’s about killing people.
We held our noses. We get 80 percent good out of r appointments. 0 percent out of democrat.
I’ll continue to hold my nose without apology.
Gotta keep killing the kids!
We may be approaching a French Revolution type uprising in this country against these communistic “judges” (and, of course, the NaziCommie DNC type extreme leftist political hacks).
these so called judges are just stooges for the worst Anti-American political extremist playbook...they do not rule on the law and they display utter contempt for our US Constitution and our liberties as a free people
it is disgusting
Once again, the courts ignore simple judicial rules. They did NOT have a plaintiff that was arguing harm. No woman came to the court and said “I need an abortion, and can’t get one”.
This was a lawsuit by the provider of the abortion.
Now, do you think this same judge would entertain a lawsuit by a cosmetic surgical center arguing it was illegal to stop women from getting breast implants?
“..Ignore this Judge ...”
Absolutely. The governor can and should.
I would hope that an emergency executive order of this nature would trump a judge’s opinion.
The army of Satan never rests.
Complications from elective abortions divert staff from treating the ChiComVD afflicted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
