[ConservativeMind]

Screw you, lady.

Deaths in the US won’t begin to approach that under any scenario.

[Russ]

I totally agree. I'm sick and tired of her peddling this doomsday BS.

[ripnbang]

I would imagine even that those numbers, assuming it was true, the vast majority of deaths will be in the urban areas simply because of population density contributing to spread...and the fact the cities didn’t want to “shut down” like NYC before it got bad for them. So, even if there IS 100K deaths, it’s not going to be uniform across the country...NYC, LA, Chicago, NOLA, etc., some other pockets, but not across the entire country.

[punknpuss]

Even worldwide the deaths haven’t exceeded 40,000. That’s worldwide. And we are supposed to believe that in the US it’s will be 200,000 if we are “perfect”? That’s total bull.

[dynoman]

It’s NOT WHAT SHE SAID!!

Here’s video of DR. Fauchi talking about not getting stuck on the numbers, and that they want to “drive it all the way down” meaning way under the minimum the models suggest.All this is context to the modeled number;

https://youtu.be/lg—anohtSQ?t=1883

Dr.Birx “we’re hoping the models are not completely right, that we can do better than the predictions are”
https://youtu.be/lg—anohtSQ?t=2900

Dr Fauchi, more on models
https://youtu.be/lg—anohtSQ?t=3001

[Williams]

Thank you, doctor. /s

[Tallguy]

“Deaths in the US won’t begin to approach that under any scenario.”

The problem is that you don’t know who to believe. Plus, whenever there’s a crisis the ‘experts’ go into CYA-mode and begin stressing ‘worst-case’ scenarios. Then the president, who has to balance public health with other concerns, has to make a call and be able to justify it.

[The_Media_never_lie]

Deaths in the US won’t begin to approach that under any scenario.

---

CYA time yet?