Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cgbg

At 1.4%, if 10 million people get infected, that’s 140,000 dead. If 60 million get infected, that’s 600,000 dead.

So, it’s not the flu.


103 posted on 03/28/2020 7:39:37 AM PDT by RightFighter (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: RightFighter

Those are some big *ifs*.


109 posted on 03/28/2020 7:44:11 AM PDT by jazminerose (Why do democrats hate black people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

So far, only people with serious symptoms are being tested. Until we can test large populations, we don’t have accurate figures on the mortality rate. Currently we are saying that people who develop serious symptoms have a mortality rate somewhere between 1 and 5%. We know it’s deadly, but we really don’t have a handle on how deadly.


110 posted on 03/28/2020 7:46:29 AM PDT by FXRP (Cogito, ergo Spam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

If. Such a nice word when you need a filler for data.

You could be right. You could equally be wrong. As more testing comes on line and the patient population grows, the mortality rate will it remain static and your “if” needs adjusting.

If is also dangerous. The next one that hits might not be a shadow of this one. But you can bet that “if” a dem is in office, they will have laid close attention to this one and they will use “if” to accomplish every dream on their wish list, all based on “if.”


117 posted on 03/28/2020 7:58:08 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson