Well, to determine whether this decision is “good” or “bad” for the country, one need only find out whether Ginsberg or Sotomayor (or Roberts) voted for it.
And that question was not answered in this legalese. Assuming Ginsberg was abble to read it at all.
MAJORITY: BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and GINSBURG, SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined.
DISSENT: THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ALITO, J., joined as to all but Part II–A–
https://immigrationcourtside.com/category/supreme-court/guerrero-lasprilla-v-barr/
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, joined in part by Justice Alito...............
Dissenting
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, joined in part by Justice Alito.[1]
In his dissent, Thomas wrote:[1]
“ ... the majority effectively nullifies a jurisdiction-stripping statute, expanding the scope of judicial review well past the boundaries set by Congress. Because this arrogation of authority flouts both the text and structure of the statute, I respectfully dissent.
https://ballotpedia.org/Guerrero-Lasprilla_v._Barr