Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NTHockey

IIRC, a lot of the actions Chesty fought in in the Pacific had the Marines with, um, NO tanks.


32 posted on 03/25/2020 12:05:47 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

Also without enough machine guns, M-1s or supplies. Doesn’t mean he could have used them. He would have been royally pissed at reducing the Corps in such a drastic manner.


77 posted on 03/25/2020 4:10:02 AM PDT by NTHockey (R yRules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr

Actually the Marines in WW-II used tanks in most of their actions. Even on Guadalcanal, where the M3 Stuarts were used quite effectively in suppressing Japanese attacks. The little ol 37mm main gun was quire effective when used with canister rounds.

To be sure their were few full on tank on tank battles, Saipan and Palau come to mind.

The Marines used the M4 Shermans as infantry support tanks mostly. Often time the presence of M4s was responsible for the Marines to advance with out taking horrific casualties as the 75mm gun was quite effective in reducing pillboxes and strong points.

On Okinawa the Sherwma were used as APCs, armored supply vehicles and for medevac of the wounded.

The book Marine Tank Battles in WW-2 gives a really good history of the use of tanks by the Marines.

Regards

alfa6 ;>}


98 posted on 03/25/2020 6:16:43 AM PDT by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson