Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Quickly And Quietly Rolls Back Insider Trading Rules For Itself (Senator Richard Burr et al exempt from insider-trading laws)
TechDirt.com ^ | Tue, Apr 16th 2013 11:11am | Mike Masnick

Posted on 03/21/2020 1:20:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

In November of 2011, the TV show 60 Minutes did a big expose on insider trading within Congress. While everyone else is subject to basic insider trading rules, it turned out that members of Congress were exempt from the rules. And, as you would imagine, many in Congress have access to market-moving, non-public information. And they made use of it. To make lots and lots of money. Of course, after that report came out and got lots of attention, Congress had to act, and within months they had passed the STOCK Act with overwhelming support in Congress to make insider trading laws that apply to everyone else finally apply to Congress and Congressional staffers as well. As that link notes:

The lopsided votes showed lawmakers desperate to regain public trust in an election year, when the public approval rating of Congress has sunk below 15 percent.
Of course, here we are in 2013 and, lo and behold, it is no longer an election year. And apparently some of the details of the ban on insider trading were beginning to chafe Congressional staffers, who found it hard to pad their income with some friendly trades on insider knowledge.

So... with very little fanfare, Congress quietly rolled back a big part of the law late last week. Specifically the part that required staffers to post disclosures about their financial transactions, so that the public could make sure there was no insider trading going on. Congress tried to cover up this fairly significant change because they, themselves, claimed that it would pose a "national risk" to have this information public. A national risk to their bank accounts.

(Excerpt) Read more at techdirt.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; insidertrading
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
"Stock Sales by Senator Richard Burr Ignite Political Uproar"
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/us/politics/coronavirus-richard-burr-insider-trading.html
1 posted on 03/21/2020 1:20:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

lamp posts


2 posted on 03/21/2020 1:23:06 PM PDT by SteveH (intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Old news, and no longer relevant. There is a law now that prohibits Congress from insider trading.


3 posted on 03/21/2020 1:24:19 PM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
Old news, and no longer relevant. There is a law now that prohibits Congress from insider trading.

They repealed it right after passing it. Bait-and-switch. That's the point of the article. Might try reading one once in awhile.

4 posted on 03/21/2020 1:26:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If you don't recognize that as sarcasm you are dumber than a bag of hammers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Congress tried to cover up this fairly significant change because they, themselves, claimed that it would pose a “national risk” to have this information public.

Our criminal class.


5 posted on 03/21/2020 1:27:00 PM PDT by Flick Lives (MIP: Media Induced Panic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Many thanks for doing the research to educate all FRers


6 posted on 03/21/2020 1:29:39 PM PDT by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is this roll-back too late to help get Rep. Chris Collins out of jail??

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Collins_(American_politician)


7 posted on 03/21/2020 1:33:53 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I have long thought that what is needed is a constitutional amendment that states simply -

Congress shall not make an exception or exemption for any member of Congress of any law, criminal or civil, that is enforceable upon the People.


8 posted on 03/21/2020 1:34:56 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt (Dad's wisdom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Kinda like the sexual assault slush fund. Protection for them, in the shorts for us.


9 posted on 03/21/2020 1:36:11 PM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Funny, no mention of DiFi.

Predictable, the media will only go after the Republicans.


10 posted on 03/21/2020 1:38:03 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I read the article. You’re right though, and I was wrong. Serves me right for listening to Tucker Carlson.


11 posted on 03/21/2020 1:43:31 PM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

There is a law, but no consequences, Troll. As long as they report the insider trade within 60 days, it’s A-OK. We peons would go to jail. Ask Martha Stewart.


12 posted on 03/21/2020 1:54:58 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
ARCHIVES Nancy Pelosi's Husband Snared In SunEdison Stock Scandal
The Daily Bail ^ | 04-10-2019 / FR Posted on 4/10/2019, 10:02:56 PM by Kevin in California

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s husband bought up to a quarter million dollars of stock in SunEdison, a now financially troubled green energy company just weeks before it announced a major 2014 acquisition that sent its stock price soaring. SunE's 2014 purchase of wind energy company First Wind “further bolstered the reputation of the company,” wrote one market-watcher at the time. “Perhaps unsurprisingly, SunEdison’s stock soared 29% on news of this acquisition alone.”

Pelosi has a well-earned reputation for shady stock purchases herself, getting shares in lucrative IPOs and
trading on inside information gleaned through Congressional meetings. Martha Stewart jailed 5 months for similar insider trading.

------------------------------------------------

THIS IS A MUST WATCH
www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwieyIHMi5PgAhUGGt8KHdG5D-A4ZBAzKCkwKXoECAEQNQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdailybail.com%2Fhome%2Fnancy-pelosis-husband-snared-in-sunedison

BUSTED NANCY SUFFERS MELTDOWN
The clip starts automatically at the perfect moment. Pelosi is asked by Steve Croft about getting
lucrative IPO shares in VISA while she was fighting a bill in Congress that would hurt VISA.

================================

GOP to push 'Pelosi Provision' in insider-trading bill
SOURCE http://thehill.com/policy/finance/209209-gop-to-push-pelosi-provision-for-stock-act http://dailybail.com/home/nancy-pelosis-husband-snared-in-sunedison-stock-scandal.html

========================================

THE PELOSI'S WEALTH

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSv_1cNollGOG8wFOw2MQTnVNypOY9awLlfhlSDPlp4k6aVF6VdxQ

========================================

THE GREAT PROGNOSTICATOR----"Trump is not going to be president"


13 posted on 03/21/2020 1:55:38 PM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“They repealed it right after passing it. Bait-and-switch. That’s the point of the article. Might try reading one once in awhile. “

OK, where does it say they repealed it?


14 posted on 03/21/2020 1:55:46 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

[They repealed it right after passing it. Bait-and-switch. That’s the point of the article. Might try reading one once in awhile. ]


They repealed the part about disclosures to the public. The SEC doesn’t need public information to go after insider trading. It has the entire DTC database at its disposal.


15 posted on 03/21/2020 1:57:04 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

Former Congressman Chris Collins has been sentenced to 26 months in federal prison for insider trading but he has not yet reported to start his sentence. Coronavirus will probably delay his April reporting date even longer.


16 posted on 03/21/2020 1:57:22 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That’s criminal. They are the ultimate insiders. They can manipulate the market at will.


17 posted on 03/21/2020 2:00:40 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

[There is a law, but no consequences, Troll. As long as they report the insider trade within 60 days, it’s A-OK. We peons would go to jail. Ask Martha Stewart.]


Chris Collins would disagree.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/17/chris-collins-sentenced-to-26-months-for-insider-trading-tip.html

The article highlights the fact that sales no longer have to be made public. The SEC doesn’t need public info to go after insider trading. It has access to the entire DTC database.


18 posted on 03/21/2020 2:00:49 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Lamp posts...


19 posted on 03/21/2020 2:00:55 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It would seem that Ms. Feinstein doesn’t exist....all articles start with Senator Richard Burr....


20 posted on 03/21/2020 2:00:57 PM PDT by yoe (Want to HELP the Slave Trade and Drug Cartels in USA? Vote for a democrat........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson